Political Party Defections and Democratic Growth in Nigeria 2019 -2023
CHAPTER ONE
Objectives of the Study
The specific objectives of this study, which were pursued from 2019 to 2023, were as follows:
- To analyze the patterns and trends of political party defections in Nigeria from 2019 to 2023.
- To assess the impact of political party defections on the stability of democratic institutions during the specified period.
- To examine the consequences of political party defections on the quality of governance and public trust in Nigeria from 2019 to 2023
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Review
Political Party Defections
Political party defections, a complex phenomenon in the Nigerian political landscape, have been extensively explored by various scholars. Ocheni and Ibrahim (2020) define political party defections as the act of elected officials switching their allegiance from one political party to another. This dynamic process can take various forms, contributing to the fluidity of Nigeria’s political environment.
The types of party defections observed in Nigeria are multifaceted, as highlighted by Adetula (2019). One common type is ideological defection, where elected officials shift parties due to perceived misalignments with the core principles and values of their original party. Another type is opportunistic defections driven by personal ambitions or disagreements, as explored by Agbese (2023). These nuances in defection types underline the intricate nature of political alliances and realignments within the Nigerian context.
Motivations behind political party defections vary widely and have been studied extensively. Adamu et al. (2020) emphasize the role of money politics as a significant motivator. Elected officials may defect to a party with greater financial resources, impacting the democratic process. Additionally, the pursuit of power and influence is a common motivation, as identified by Agbese (2023). Understanding these motivations is crucial for deciphering the intricate web of political dynamics and individual interests that drive party defections.
Examining the historical context of party defections in Nigeria provides valuable insights into the evolution of political alliances. Ajani (2023) delves into historical instances, such as the annulment of the June 12 Presidential election, highlighting how political decisions have influenced the prevalence of defections. Historical events shape the current landscape, and understanding these dynamics is essential for contextualizing the contemporary patterns of party defections.
In summary, political party defections in Nigeria encompass a spectrum of types, motivations, and historical influences. The work of Ocheni and Ibrahim (2020) provides a foundational definition, while Adetula (2019) and Agbese (2023) contribute to our understanding of the diverse types and motivations behind defections. Exploring the historical context, as highlighted by Ajani (2023), adds depth to this understanding, emphasizing the need to consider past events in analyzing the contemporary landscape of political party defections in Nigeria.
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Introduction
The methodology section is fundamental to the research process, providing a detailed account of the strategies employed to address the research questions and achieve the study objectives. This chapter outlines the research design, population, sampling technique, sources and methods of data collection, data analysis procedures, validity and reliability measures, and ethical considerations.
Research Design
The research design selected for this study is a quantitative survey, adhering to the positivist research philosophy. This approach aligns with the principles outlined by Saunders et al. (2016), emphasizing the systematic collection of numerical data. A positivist stance asserts that knowledge can be derived from observable and measurable phenomena, emphasizing empirical evidence and the testing of hypotheses. In the context of political party defections and democratic growth in Nigeria, a quantitative survey design is particularly advantageous. It allows for the structured collection of data, facilitating the examination of patterns, relationships, and trends (Saunders et al., 2016). This aligns with the positivist perspective, emphasizing the objective analysis of observable social phenomena.
The choice of a survey design is further supported by Anderson et al. (2020), who underscore its suitability for studying a large and diverse population. Nigeria, being a nation with a varied demographic and geographical landscape, necessitates a research approach that accommodates this diversity. The survey design enables the inclusion of a wide range of participants, ensuring a representative sample that enhances the external validity of the study. As noted by Anderson et al. (2020), the ability to generalize findings to a broader context is a key strength of the survey design. In the context of political party defections and democratic growth, the diverse perspectives of a large sample contribute to a more robust understanding of the phenomenon.
The justification for the chosen approach extends to its capacity to measure variables and explore associations systematically. This aligns with the principles of positivism, emphasizing the quantification of variables and the identification of empirical patterns. The positivist philosophy assumes that social phenomena can be objectively studied through measurable indicators (Saunders et al., 2016). A survey design, therefore, allows for the quantification of attitudes, opinions, and behaviours related to political party defections and democratic growth. The systematic nature of the survey design, as emphasized by Anderson et al. (2020), supports the measurement of multiple variables concurrently. This approach is critical for gaining a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between political party dynamics and democratic development in Nigeria.
In summary, the chosen research design, a quantitative survey aligned with the positivist research philosophy, is well-suited for the study of political party defections and democratic growth in Nigeria. It enables the systematic collection of numerical data, facilitates the examination of patterns and relationships, accommodates the diverse population of the country, and permits the measurement of variables associated with the phenomenon under investigation. This approach aligns with the empirical and objective orientation of positivism, providing a robust foundation for the study’s objectives (Saunders et al., 2016; Anderson et al., 2020).
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Data Presentation
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
The study delved into the multifaceted landscape of political party defections in Nigeria, exploring the motivations, consequences, and public perceptions surrounding this phenomenon. The research utilized a quantitative survey approach, aligning with a positivist research philosophy, to systematically collect numerical data from a diverse and dispersed population. A convenience sampling technique was employed, with a sample size of 120 respondents, to ensure practicality and accessibility.
Demographically, the respondents were predominantly aged between 24 and 26, with a significant representation of males holding educational qualifications ranging from Bachelor’s degrees to Master’s degrees. The political affiliations of the respondents were diverse, with a notable presence of supporters from the All Progressives Congress (APC), the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), and the Labour Party (LP). Furthermore, the majority of respondents exhibited a high awareness of their respective parties’ internal dynamics.
The study investigated respondents’ perspectives on the impact of political party defections on democratic growth in Nigeria. The findings revealed a nuanced understanding among respondents, with a substantial proportion agreeing that the frequent switches of elected officials between political parties hinder democratic growth. There was also a prevalent belief that the public perceives political party defections as a normal and acceptable part of democratic processes. However, respondents expressed concerns about the consequences of these defections, with a significant number agreeing that such actions erode public trust in political institutions and undermine the credibility of the political system.
Table 4.15 presented mean scores for respondents’ perceptions of the patterns and trends of political party defections and their consequences on governance and public trust. While both aspects received a mean score of 87.00, the lack of a defined scale made it challenging to interpret the specific significance of these scores.
The age distribution of respondents revealed a predominant representation of individuals between 24 and 26 years old, suggesting that the perspectives captured in the study are reflective of the younger demographic. This demographic skew may influence the generalizability of the findings to the broader population, particularly considering the diverse age groups within Nigerian society.
In analyzing the gender distribution, the study found a higher percentage of male respondents (85.6%) compared to females (14.4%). This gender imbalance raises questions about the inclusivity of the study, as the perspectives of female respondents might be underrepresented. Future research should aim for a more balanced gender distribution to capture a holistic understanding of public perceptions.
The educational background of respondents was diverse, with a significant number holding Bachelor’s and Master’s degrees. This educational diversity strengthens the reliability of the findings, as it indicates a broad representation of perspectives from individuals with varying levels of academic exposure.
The political party affiliation distribution revealed a fairly equal representation of respondents affiliated with APC, PDP, and LP. This balance ensures that the findings are not skewed towards a particular party, providing a more comprehensive understanding of public perceptions across the political spectrum.
The study’s findings shed light on the complexities surrounding political party defections in Nigeria. Respondents exhibited a nuanced understanding of the impact of defections on democratic growth, with concerns about the erosion of public trust and the credibility of the political system. These insights contribute to the ongoing discourse on political dynamics in Nigeria, providing valuable perspectives for policymakers, political actors, and researchers alike. However, the study’s demographic imbalances should be acknowledged, emphasizing the need for future research to ensure a more representative sample.
Conclusion
The hypotheses tested in this study provided valuable insights into the perceptions and attitudes of respondents regarding political party defections in Nigeria. The findings indicated a significant agreement among respondents that the frequent switches of elected officials between political parties hinder democratic growth, erode public trust in political institutions, and undermine the credibility of the political system. This aligns with existing concerns about the impact of political instability on the democratic processes in emerging democracies like Nigeria.
The assumed mean of 0 and the critical table value of 2.92 at a 5% level of significance were employed to test these hypotheses. The mean scores from Table 4.15, though lacking a defined scale, suggested a consensus among respondents regarding the patterns of political party defections and their consequences on governance and public trust. The observed agreement with the statements presented in Tables 4.7 to 4.9 further supported the contention that party defections are perceived as detrimental to democratic growth and public trust.
In conclusion, the study underscores the importance of addressing the challenges posed by political party defections to safeguard the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic processes. The findings advocate for proactive measures to mitigate the negative repercussions of defections, fostering a political environment conducive to democratic stability and public trust in political institutions.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations were proposed:
- Strengthen Legal Frameworks: Enhance and enforce existing laws governing party defections, ensuring that they provide clear guidelines and consequences for elected officials who switch parties. This can act as a deterrent and contribute to a more stable political environment.
- Promote Internal Party Cohesion: Political parties should prioritize internal cohesion by addressing ideological differences, fostering open communication, and providing mechanisms for conflict resolution. This may reduce the motivation for elected officials to defect due to internal disagreements.
- Public Awareness Campaigns: Implement public awareness campaigns to educate citizens about the consequences of frequent party defections on democratic growth. This could include highlighting the potential impact on governance, political stability, and public trust.
- Enhance Political Education: Incorporate political education into the national curriculum to cultivate a politically informed citizenry. An electorate with a better understanding of political dynamics may be more critical in their evaluation of elected officials, potentially reducing the acceptability of party defections.
- Party Financing Reforms: Address financial motivations for party defections by implementing transparent party financing reforms. Stricter regulations on campaign funding and increased transparency may reduce the influence of financial considerations in the decision to switch parties.
- Strengthen Democratic Institutions: Invest in building and strengthening democratic institutions. A robust institutional framework can help withstand the challenges posed by party defections, contributing to the overall stability of the democratic system.
- Encourage Intra-Party Democracy: Foster a culture of intra-party democracy where decisions are made collectively, reducing the likelihood of elected officials feeling marginalized or resorting to defection due to disagreements with party leadership.
- Citizen Engagement Platforms: Establish platforms for citizens to actively engage with elected officials, providing feedback and holding them accountable. This may create a direct line of communication, reducing the need for officials to switch parties to express dissent or seek public approval.
Contribution to Knowledge
The findings of this study contribute significantly to the existing body of knowledge in several key areas. Firstly, the research sheds light on the nuanced motivations behind political party defections in Nigeria, delving into factors such as ideological misalignments, personal ambitions, and internal party disagreements. This in-depth exploration provides a richer understanding of the complex dynamics that drive elected officials to switch allegiances, offering insights that extend beyond conventional explanations.
Secondly, the study enhances our comprehension of the implications of party defections on democratic growth. By investigating the perceptions of the Nigerian electorate, the research reveals the potential erosion of public trust in political institutions due to frequent party switches. The analysis of public opinion regarding the acceptability of defections as a normal part of democratic processes further refines our understanding of how these political manoeuvres are perceived by the citizenry, influencing the broader democratic landscape.
Lastly, the comparative analysis of political party dynamics in Nigeria, drawing parallels with experiences in other democracies, contributes a global perspective. By examining patterns and trends from 2019 to 2023, the research provides a temporal dimension to the understanding of party defections, capturing the evolving nature of these political shifts. This temporal aspect adds depth to the existing literature, allowing for a more dynamic and context-specific comprehension of the impact of defections on democratic stability.
References
- Adamu, A., Ocheni, D., & Ibrahim, S. (2020). Money Politics and Analysis of Voting Behaviour in Nigeria: Challenges and Prospects for Free and Fair Elections. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research, 3(3), 89–99.
- Adetula, V. (2019). Godfathers, Money Politics, and Electoral Violence in Nigeria: Focus on the 2015 Elections. Paper presented at a Two-Day National Conference on The 2015 General Elections in Nigeria: The Real Issues organized by the Electoral Institute. Retrieved from http://www.inecnigeria.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/ConferencePaper-by-Victor-Adetula.pdf.
- Agbese, P. O. (2023). The 2015 Nigerian presidential election: How money became President Jonathan’s Albatross. DINJA: The Searchlight, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.dinjathinktank.org/dinja/index.php/dinja/article/view/7
- Aidt, T. S., Asatryan, Z., Badalyan, L., & Heinemann, F. (2023). Vote buying or (political) business (cycles) as usual? CESifo Working Paper No. 5508, September.
- Ajani, J. (2023). Why we annulled the June 12 Presidential election – General Ibrahim Babangida. Retrieved from: https://.ng/news/june-12-presidential-election-was-annulled-to-prevent-coup-babangida/ [Accessed 8 June 2022].
- Anderson, V., Fontinha, R., & Robson, F. (2020). Research Methods in Human Resource Management: Investigating a Business Issue (4th ed.). London: CIPD.
- Babarinsa, D. (2022). Here I am, buy me! 30 June 2022. Retrieved from https://guardian.ng/opinion/here-i-am-buy-me/
- Beiske, B. (2017). Research Methods: Uses and Limitations of questionnaires, interviews and case studies. GRIN Verlag.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business Research Methods (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bliznakovski, J., Borjan, G., & Misha, P. (2021). The Informal Life of Political Parties in the Western Balkan Societies. Institute for Democracy ‘Societas Civilis’ Skopje, INFORM project. Retrieved from http://formalinformal.eu/files/news/2017/Deliverables%20and%20Milestones%202017/IDSCS_Informal%20Life%20of%20Political%20Parties-Report-27092017.pdf
