Pragmatics Analysis of President Tinubu's 2024 1st October Speech

Pragmatics Analysis of President Tinubu’s 2024 1st October Speech

Chapter One

Objectives of the Study

The objectives of this study are to:

Identify the pragmatic acts employed in President Tinubu’s 2024 1st October speech.
Examine the speech acts used to convey the President’s intentions.
Analyze the contextual features that influence the interpretation of the speech.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the speech in achieving its communicative goals.

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

Conceptual Review

Pragmatics and Political Discourse

Pragmatics is the branch of linguistics concerned with the study of meaning in context, focusing on how speakers and listeners interpret utterances beyond their literal meanings (Austin, 2020). Political discourse, on the other hand, refers to spoken or written communication used in political settings, including speeches, debates, and policies that shape public opinion and governance (Fairclough, 2021).

According to Johnstone (2022), pragmatics examines how meaning is constructed through language use in specific communicative situations. Levinson (2021) defines pragmatics as the study of language usage about speakers’ intentions and contextual factors. Political discourse, as defined by Chilton (2004), is a specialized form of discourse where language serves the purpose of persuasion, negotiation, and power assertion. Abuya (2022) emphasizes that political discourse is characterized by strategic language use, including rhetorical devices, metaphorical expressions, and ideological framing.

While pragmatics provides valuable insights into how meaning is constructed, critics argue that it often lacks a clear methodological framework for analyzing complex political texts (Blommaert, 2021). Additionally, pragmatics sometimes oversimplifies meaning by focusing on speaker intent while neglecting audience reception and sociopolitical influences (Wodak, 2021). Political discourse, on the other hand, is critiqued for being overly broad, encompassing various forms of communication, which makes its study challenging (Osisanwo, 2021).

Pragmatics plays a crucial role in political communication by uncovering implicit meanings, persuasive strategies, and ideological undertones in political speeches (Sharndama, 2023). It helps in understanding how politicians use language to shape public perception, create alliances, and justify actions. For instance, the speech act theory, as discussed by Austin (1962), highlights how political leaders perform actions such as promises, threats, and declarations through language. Despite its usefulness, pragmatic analysis has limitations in political discourse. One major challenge is the subjective nature of interpretation, as different analysts may derive varying meanings from the same speech (Ike-Nwafor, 2023). Additionally, pragmatics does not fully account for the historical and ideological contexts that influence political language (Van Dijk, 2020). Lastly, political actors often employ ambiguous and coded language, making pragmatic analysis insufficient in capturing underlying power dynamics (Fairclough, 2021).

CHAPTER THREE

METHODOLOGY

Advertisements

Research Design

The study adopted a quantitative survey research design, which was considered suitable for examining the research objectives in a structured and measurable manner. Quantitative research design focuses on the collection of numerical data and its analysis using statistical tools (Saunders, Lewis, and Thornhill, 2019). The survey method allowed the researcher to gather data from a large number of respondents, ensuring the results were generalizable to the target population (Bell, Bryman, and Harley, 2019). Additionally, the structured nature of the survey facilitated comparisons between variables and enhanced the reliability of findings (Frankfort-Nachmias, Nachmias, & DeWaard, 2021).

This research design was chosen due to its ability to efficiently capture trends, attitudes, and relationships between variables (Easterby-Smith, Thorpe, and Jackson, 2018). The study sought to measure respondents’ perceptions on key research constructs, making the quantitative approach appropriate. Furthermore, survey research enabled the collection of standardized responses, reducing bias and ensuring objective analysis (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).

Population of the Study

The target population for this study consisted of 2,000 respondents who were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. The target population represents the entire group of individuals relevant to the research objectives, from which a sample is drawn (Saunders, Lewis, and Thornhill, 2019).

A large population was chosen to enhance the representativeness of the findings and improve the generalizability of the results (Frankfort-Nachmias, Nachmias, & DeWaard, 2021). Additionally, selecting a population of 2,000 respondents ensured that the study captured diverse perspectives, reducing the likelihood of bias in the responses (Bell, 2022).

CHAPTER FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

Data Presentation

Demographic Distribution of Respondents

CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of Findings

This study examined the pragmatic, stylistic, and discourse features of President Tinubu’s 2024 1st October speech. The analysis focused on the speech’s use of pragmatic acts, speech acts, contextual influences, and communicative effectiveness. The findings provide insight into the role of language in political communication and how it shapes public perception, mobilizes support, and conveys ideological messages.

One of the major findings of the study is that President Tinubu’s speech employed significant pragmatic acts, demonstrating a deliberate use of language to perform actions rather than merely convey information. The speech contained a mix of directive, commissive, assertive, and expressive pragmatic acts, which were strategically used to reinforce key messages, assure citizens, and solicit support for government policies. By employing these acts, the speech sought to create a sense of national unity and encourage public cooperation with the administration’s policies. The findings show that the use of pragmatic acts in political discourse is not accidental but carefully crafted to achieve specific communicative objectives.

Furthermore, the study found that pragmatic acts such as persuasion, reassurance, and commitment played a crucial role in structuring the speech. These acts contributed to the effectiveness of the speech in engaging the audience and reinforcing key policy positions. The deliberate selection of words and phrases ensured that the President’s messages were communicated and understood by a diverse audience.

Another key finding is that the speech acts used in President Tinubu’s address significantly conveyed his intentions. The study identified a range of speech acts, including assertives, directives, expressives, and commissives, each serving a distinct purpose. Assertive speech acts were used to make factual statements about government policies and initiatives, reinforcing the administration’s commitment to addressing national challenges. Directive speech acts were employed to call on citizens to support government programs and work towards national development. Expressive speech acts were evident in the President’s appeals for unity, resilience, and patriotism, creating an emotional connection with the audience. Commissive speech acts, which involve making commitments or promises, were also present in the speech, as the President pledged to implement reforms and improve the welfare of Nigerians.

The findings highlight the strategic nature of speech acts in political discourse. By carefully selecting the type of speech act used in different sections of the speech, the President was able to craft a message that not only informed but also motivated and reassured the public. This confirms the importance of speech acts in political communication, as they serve as tools for persuasion, leadership reinforcement, and policy promotion.

The study also found that contextual features played a significant role in the interpretation of the speech. The speech was delivered in a politically and economically sensitive period, following major policy changes such as the removal of fuel subsidies. These contextual factors influenced how the audience perceived and responded to the speech. The analysis revealed that the President’s choice of words, tone, and thematic structure reflected an awareness of the prevailing economic challenges and the need to reassure the public.

The findings indicate that political speeches cannot be analyzed in isolation from their socio-political context. Context determines the effectiveness of a speech, as audience interpretation is shaped by prior knowledge, political ideology, and economic realities. The study found that contextual elements such as the national economic situation, public sentiment, and media framing contributed to the reception of the speech. The President’s emphasis on economic resilience, national unity, and policy direction resonated with the audience due to the prevailing economic climate.

Moreover, the study found that audience perception was also shaped by previous government actions and public trust in leadership. The effectiveness of the speech in persuading and mobilizing support was influenced by public confidence in the administration’s ability to deliver on its promises. This finding highlights the dynamic relationship between language and context in political communication.

The study revealed that President Tinubu’s speech was effective in achieving its communicative goals. The effectiveness of the speech was measured based on clarity, persuasiveness, emotional appeal, and ability to mobilize public support. The findings indicate that the speech successfully conveyed its intended messages, engaged the audience, and reinforced government policies.

One of the factors that contributed to the effectiveness of the speech was its rhetorical structure. The President’s use of repetition, metaphors, and parallelism enhanced the speech’s persuasiveness and memorability. Additionally, the use of direct address, inclusive pronouns, and appeals to national identity strengthened the emotional connection between the speaker and the audience. These rhetorical strategies ensured that the speech was not only informative but also engaging and impactful.

Furthermore, the study found that the speech’s effectiveness was enhanced by its logical organization and thematic progression. The speech followed a structured format, moving from an acknowledgment of national challenges to policy recommendations and calls to action. This logical flow helped maintain audience engagement and reinforced key messages. Additionally, the use of simple and accessible language made the speech widely understandable, ensuring that its messages reached a broad audience.

The findings also indicate that the speech was effective in shaping public discourse. The speech sparked discussions in the media, among political analysts, and on social media platforms. This suggests that the speech was successful in influencing public conversations and reinforcing government narratives. The ability of a political speech to generate discussions and reactions is a key indicator of its communicative effectiveness.

The study’s findings have significant implications for political communication and discourse analysis. One of the key implications is that political leaders strategically use language to achieve multiple objectives, including persuasion, mobilization, and policy reinforcement. The findings confirm that political speeches are not neutral expressions of information but carefully constructed texts designed to achieve strategic goals.

Additionally, the study highlights the importance of audience perception in political discourse. The effectiveness of a speech depends not only on its content but also on how it is received by different segments of society. Factors such as political alignment, media framing, and economic conditions influence how audiences interpret and respond to political messages. This suggests that future research on political speeches should consider audience reception as a critical component of discourse analysis.

The study also underscores the role of language in shaping national identity and public sentiment. Political speeches serve as tools for constructing national narratives, reinforcing ideological positions, and legitimizing government actions. The findings suggest that political leaders use rhetorical strategies to foster a sense of unity, shared purpose, and national resilience. By appealing to common values and collective identity, political speeches seek to align public sentiment with government objectives.

Implications of the Findings

The findings of this study on President Tinubu’s 2024 1st October speech carry significant implications for political communication, governance, and public discourse. By analyzing the pragmatic, discourse, and stylistic features of the speech, this study provides insights into how political leaders use language to achieve strategic objectives. These implications extend to political leadership, media representation, national unity, and the broader study of discourse analysis.

One of the key implications of the study is that political communication is not merely about conveying information but about shaping public perception and mobilizing support. The findings indicate that political leaders strategically use speech acts—such as assertives, directives, and commissives—to reinforce their authority, persuade the public, and frame national narratives. This suggests that future political speeches should be carefully crafted to balance factual accuracy, emotional appeal, and rhetorical effectiveness to maximize public engagement.

Additionally, the study highlights the importance of contextual awareness in political speeches. The effectiveness of President Tinubu’s speech was influenced by the socio-political and economic climate at the time of delivery. This implies that for political messages to resonate with the audience, they must reflect public concerns and be delivered in a way that aligns with current realities. Political leaders must therefore consider timing, audience sentiment, and prevailing societal conditions when crafting speeches to ensure maximum impact.

The findings also have significant implications for governance and policy implementation. The study reveals that political speeches play a crucial role in shaping public acceptance of government policies. By employing pragmatic acts such as persuasion, reassurance, and commitment, political leaders can build public trust and encourage compliance with government initiatives. This implies that effective political communication should be an integral part of policy rollout, ensuring that citizens understand, accept, and support governmental decisions.

Furthermore, the study suggests that political leaders must be cautious in making promises within their speeches. The presence of commissive speech acts—where commitments and assurances are made—implies that the government’s credibility depends on fulfilling those promises. If political leaders fail to deliver on their commitments, public trust in leadership may erode, leading to dissatisfaction and resistance to future policies. This underscores the need for a realistic and transparent approach to political messaging.

The findings also have implications for media coverage and public discourse. Political speeches, especially those of national significance, serve as catalysts for media discussions and public debates. The study found that President Tinubu’s speech generated significant reactions, demonstrating the media’s role in interpreting, framing, and amplifying political messages. This suggests that the media must critically analyze political speeches rather than merely reporting them. By providing contextual analysis, fact-checking, and diverse perspectives, the media can enhance public understanding and engagement with political messages.

Moreover, the study implies that citizens must approach political speeches with critical thinking. Given that political speeches are crafted to achieve strategic objectives, the public must engage with them analytically, distinguishing between persuasive rhetoric and substantive policy proposals. Educational institutions and civic organizations should promote media literacy and discourse analysis skills to help citizens critically evaluate political communication.

Another significant implication of the findings is the role of political speeches in fostering national unity. President Tinubu’s speech employed inclusive language, nationalistic appeals, and unifying rhetoric to reinforce a collective national identity. This suggests that political leaders can use language as a tool to bridge societal divisions and strengthen national cohesion. However, the study also indicates that the effectiveness of such messages depends on the audience’s perception of the government’s actions. National unity rhetoric must be backed by policies that promote inclusivity, equity, and social justice to have a lasting impact.

Overall, the findings contribute to the broader field of political communication and discourse analysis by reinforcing the importance of language as a tool of governance. The study highlights the strategic use of speech acts, rhetorical devices, and contextual awareness in political speeches, offering valuable insights into how language functions in political leadership. Future research can build on these findings by examining the long-term impact of political speeches on public opinion and policy implementation.

Conclusion

This study examined the pragmatic and discourse features of President Tinubu’s 2024 1st October speech, focusing on the speech acts employed, contextual influences, and the overall effectiveness of the address. The findings revealed that the speech was strategically crafted using various pragmatic acts to convey intentions, persuade the audience, and reinforce national unity. The use of assertive, commissive, and directive speech acts demonstrated the President’s attempt to reassure citizens, outline policy directions, and encourage collective action.

The results from the one-sample t-test indicated that the pragmatic and speech acts used in the speech were statistically significant, suggesting that they played a crucial role in shaping audience interpretation. Furthermore, the findings emphasized the influence of contextual factors—such as economic challenges and governance concerns—on how the speech was received. The effectiveness of the speech in achieving its communicative goals was also significant, highlighting the importance of rhetoric in political leadership.

These findings have critical implications for political communication, governance, media discourse, and national unity. They underscore the power of language in influencing public perception and policy acceptance. Political leaders must recognize that effective communication is essential for building trust, managing expectations, and fostering national cohesion. Additionally, the media and the public must engage with political speeches critically, ensuring informed discussions that hold leaders accountable.

In conclusion, this study contributes to the broader understanding of political discourse and its role in governance. While President Tinubu’s speech demonstrated the strategic use of language in leadership, its long-term impact depends on the government’s ability to translate words into action. Future research could explore audience reception and comparative analyses of political speeches to deepen insights into the evolving nature of political rhetoric in Nigeria.

Recommendations

Based on the findings of this study, the following recommendations are made:

Enhancement of Political Communication Strategies:Political leaders should employ more deliberate and inclusive communication strategies to ensure clarity, accessibility, and engagement with a diverse audience. Future speeches should incorporate relatable narratives and culturally relevant language to foster a stronger connection with the public.
Integration of Citizen Feedback in Policy Communication:Government officials should actively seek and incorporate public feedback before and after delivering major speeches. This can be achieved through town hall meetings, opinion polls, and digital engagement platforms. Doing so will make political communication more responsive to the needs and concerns of citizens.
Training in Pragmatic and Rhetorical Skills for Political Leaders:Given the impact of speech acts on public perception, political leaders and spokespersons should undergo training in pragmatic and rhetorical skills. This will enable them to craft messages that are not only persuasive but also transparent, fostering trust between the government and the public.
Balanced Use of Speech Acts to Promote Action-Oriented Governance:Speeches should go beyond promises and persuasion by incorporating concrete action plans and timelines. This will enhance credibility and public trust, ensuring that political rhetoric translates into meaningful governance outcomes.
Encouragement of Media and Academic Analysis of Political Speeches:Media professionals and researchers should be encouraged to analyze political speeches critically. This will enhance public discourse, promote accountability, and provide insights into how political communication influences governance and societal development.

Contribution to Knowledge

This study contributes to the field of political discourse analysis by providing empirical insights into the pragmatic and speech acts employed in President Tinubu’s 2024 1st October speech. By systematically analyzing how various speech acts were used to convey intentions, engage the public, and achieve communicative goals, the study deepens the understanding of political rhetoric in contemporary Nigerian governance. It highlights the significance of linguistic choices in shaping public perception and influencing political discourse, reinforcing the importance of strategic communication in leadership.

Furthermore, the study advances the application of pragma-stylistic analysis in evaluating political speeches within the Nigerian context. While previous studies have focused on historical and Western political speeches, this research expands the scope by examining a recent presidential speech, thereby offering fresh perspectives on the evolving patterns of political communication in Nigeria. The findings underscore the role of language as a tool for persuasion, mobilization, and governance, contributing to ongoing discussions in discourse analysis and political linguistics.

Another major contribution of this study is the demonstration of how contextual features influence the interpretation of political speeches. The study provides empirical evidence that external factors, such as socio-political climate, economic conditions, and public sentiment, shape how speeches are received and understood. By emphasizing the interplay between linguistic elements and contextual factors, this research broadens the scope of critical discourse analysis and pragmatics, offering valuable insights into the dynamics of political communication in Nigeria.

Additionally, this research has practical implications for political speechwriting and media communication. It offers guidance on how political figures can craft speeches that effectively resonate with their audience while maintaining clarity, persuasiveness, and credibility. The study’s findings can serve as a reference for politicians, speechwriters, and communication experts in developing more impactful and audience-centered political messages.

Lastly, this study provides a foundation for future research in political discourse analysis by presenting a structured framework for evaluating political speeches using linguistic and pragmatic principles. The methodology adopted in this study can be replicated in analyzing speeches from other political figures, both within and outside Nigeria, to draw comparative insights on political communication strategies. By bridging the gap between linguistics and governance, this research contributes to a broader understanding of how language shapes leadership and public engagement.

Limitations of the Study

Despite its contributions, this study has certain limitations. First, the analysis focused solely on President Tinubu’s 2024 1st October speech, which, while significant, represents only a single instance of political discourse. A broader analysis involving multiple speeches from different contexts could provide more comprehensive insights into the patterns of political communication in Nigeria. Additionally, the study relied on a pragma-stylistic approach, which, although effective, does not account for non-verbal elements such as tone, gestures, and audience reactions that also contribute to meaning-making in political speeches. Furthermore, the study’s findings are based on quantitative and qualitative analysis from a specific sample size, meaning that generalizations should be made with caution. Future studies may benefit from incorporating multimodal discourse analysis and expanding the dataset to include more political speeches from various leaders and political contexts.

Suggestions for Further Studies

Future research should consider a comparative analysis of multiple political speeches delivered by different Nigerian presidents to identify patterns, continuity, and shifts in political rhetoric over time. This approach would provide deeper insights into the evolution of presidential communication strategies, audience engagement, and the effectiveness of different linguistic and rhetorical techniques. Additionally, researchers could explore how various sociopolitical factors, such as economic crises, security challenges, and international relations, influence the structure and content of presidential speeches.

Another area for further research is the incorporation of multimodal discourse analysis to examine the role of non-verbal elements in political communication. Factors such as gestures, facial expressions, and vocal tone contribute significantly to how political speeches are perceived by the public. By integrating these elements into pragma-stylistic studies, future researchers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of how political figures use both verbal and non-verbal strategies to convey their messages effectively.

Additionally, future studies could focus on audience reception and interpretation of political speeches using psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic approaches. Understanding how different demographic groups perceive and respond to presidential speeches can provide valuable insights into the impact of language on public opinion, policy acceptance, and national discourse. Such studies can also explore the role of media framing in shaping audience interpretations, especially in the digital age where political speeches are widely disseminated across various platforms.

References

Abdelrahman, G. E. M. (2024). Pragma-stylistic analysis of dramatic texts: An overview. Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts, 46(2), 3–13.
Aboh, S. C. (2019). Political discourse of hate speeches in Nigeria (Master’s dissertation, Department of Linguistics and Nigerian Languages, University of Nigeria, Nsukka).
Abuya, E. J. (2022). A pragma-stylistic analysis of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan’s inaugural speech. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 8–15.
Abuya, E. J. (2024). Pragma-stylistic analysis of President Goodluck Ebele Jonathan inaugural speech. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p8
Allagbé, A. A., & Amoussou, F. (2023). A pragmatic literary stylistic analysis of a political speech delivered by a member of the opposition party at the induction ceremony of the 9th Legislative Assembly, Benin Republic. In Prof. Dr. Mustafa Mutluer & Assist. Prof. Dr. Aytekin Erdoğan (Eds.), Full Texts Book EGE 2nd International Congress on Social Sciences & Humanities (pp. 201–215). Ege University, Izmir, Türkiye. ISBN: 978-625-367-169-3.
Alm-Arvius, C. (2023). Figures of speech. Lund, Sweden: Studentlitteratur.
Amoussou, F., & Aguessy, N. J. A. (2020). Decoding manipulative strategies and ideological features in Trump’s speech on the Coronavirus pandemic: A critical political discourse analysis. Studies in English Language Teaching, 8(4), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.22158/selt.v8n4p14
Amoussou, F., & Allagbé, A. (2023). Political discourse on health crisis: A pragmatic analysis of President Muhammadu Buhari’s speech on COVID-19. In O. Erkmen & G. Gafurova (Eds.), Proceedings Book 9th International Zeugma Conference on Scientific Research (pp. 750–759). Gaziantep, Türkiye.
Amoussou, F., Djimet, I., & Allagbé, A. A. (2022). Analysis of deictic features in a text about arranged marriage in Tongue of Promise. Revue Panafricaine de la Jeunesse – Pan African Youth Journal, 1(3), 429–441. ISSN: 2790-6248 / 2790-6256.
Anagbogu, P. N., Eme, A. C., & Mbah, B. M. (2022). Introduction to linguistics. Akwa: Amaka Dream Ltd.

Related Topics:

Other Topics