Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Youth Participation in Food Crop Production in Osun State
Chapter One
Objectives of the Study
The main objective of this study is to examine the socio-economic factors influencing youth participation in food crop production in the Osun State. Specifically, the study aims to:
- Assess the impact of access to land and financial resources on youth participation in food crop production.
- Investigate the role of education, training, and extension services in influencing youth involvement in food crop production.
- Examine the effects of socio-cultural perceptions and infrastructural support on youth engagement in agriculture.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Conceptual Framework
Concept of Youth in Agricultural Development
The concept of “youth” varies significantly across literature and policy contexts, often depending on age, functionality, and cultural perceptions. Age-wise, youth are commonly defined within the age bracket of 15 to 35 years, though this varies by country and institutional framework (Fawole & Ozkan, 2019). Functionally, youth are also understood in terms of their transition stage—neither fully dependent nor entirely autonomous adults—which influences their identity and role in social and economic structures, including agriculture (Elias et al., 2018).
Youth play a pivotal role in agricultural transformation, particularly in regions with aging farming populations and underutilized agricultural potential. Their energy, adaptability, and openness to innovation can revolutionize traditional farming systems. Engaging youth in agriculture offers a strategic avenue for addressing unemployment, especially in rural areas where alternative livelihoods are scarce (Bello et al., 2021). Their participation in agribusiness and value chains is critical to enhancing productivity, introducing technology, and ensuring long-term food security (Tiraieyari & Krauss, 2018). Moreover, youth-driven agricultural initiatives often serve as models for sustainable development, given their inclination toward eco-friendly practices and modern techniques (Gautam et al., 2017).
Despite this potential, the youth demographic in agriculture is often misunderstood or inconsistently defined, particularly in policy documents. A critique of existing national and international frameworks reveals a lack of coherence in youth classification, which undermines effective targeting and program implementation. For instance, while one policy may classify youth up to age 29, another extends the bracket to age 40, leading to mismatched interventions and funding gaps (Zins & Weill, 2016). Such inconsistencies also affect data comparability and the evaluation of youth-focused agricultural projects.
Furthermore, youth engagement in agriculture is often portrayed either as a last resort or a welfare mechanism rather than a viable and profitable career pathway (Pelzom & Katel, 2018). This perception diminishes the attractiveness of agriculture among educated youth, reinforcing stereotypes that agriculture is synonymous with drudgery and poverty (Etim & Udoh, 2018). Addressing these structural and perceptual barriers requires deliberate policy alignment and inclusive program design that reflects the real needs and aspirations of youth (Adesina & Eforuoku, 2016).
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
Advertisements
Research Design
The research design for this study adopted a quantitative and cross-sectional survey research design. This design is commonly used in social science research to collect numerical data that can be analyzed using statistical techniques (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). The quantitative approach was selected because it allows for the collection of data that is objective, precise, and can be generalized to the larger population, providing a clear understanding of patterns and relationships (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, 2019). Specifically, a survey research design was chosen to assess the attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors of respondents towards the phenomenon being studied. This approach is advantageous as it allows for the gathering of data from a large number of respondents in a relatively short period of time and ensures consistency in the way data is collected (Bell, 2022). The survey design is particularly appropriate for this study, as it seeks to examine a large population’s views and behaviors related to a specific issue.
Study Settings
The geographical setting for this study is Nigeria, with a specific focus on respondents from urban and rural areas. Nigeria, as the most populous country in Africa, presents a rich and diverse landscape for research on social and economic phenomena (Frankfort-Nachmias, Nachmias, & DeWaard, 2021). The study aimed to capture the perspectives of respondents from various socio-economic backgrounds and regions, ensuring that the data collected is representative of the broader population. The urban and rural settings were selected to compare differences in responses based on geographic location and access to resources. By focusing on different areas of Nigeria, this study provides valuable insights into the disparities in access to education, healthcare, and employment opportunities, which are critical for understanding the youth’s engagement in various socio-economic activities, particularly in agriculture.
Population of the Study
The target population for this study is 20,000 respondents, consisting of youth aged between 18 and 35 years from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The choice of this target population is based on the premise that youth are at the center of socio-economic development, and their involvement in agriculture and other sectors is critical for the country’s economic growth. According to Charan and Biswas (2019), it is essential to choose a population that is both relevant and specific to the research question. The population of 20,000 respondents was determined to provide a broad representation of the youth in Nigeria, enabling the study to draw meaningful conclusions about their participation in agriculture. A larger sample size is beneficial in increasing the reliability and validity of the findings (Sreedharan, Chandrasekharan, & Gopakumar, 2019). The youth demographic was chosen because they represent a key group that can drive innovation, economic transformation, and the sustainable development of sectors such as agriculture.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
Data Presentation
Demographic Distribution of Respondents
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
This section provides an overview of the key findings of the study, outlining how they contribute to the understanding of the factors influencing youth involvement in agriculture, particularly in the context of Nigeria. The findings are organized according to the primary objectives of the study, including the socio-economic factors affecting youth participation, the role of agricultural policies and government initiatives, and the impact of technological advancements in agricultural practices.
One of the significant findings of this study is the strong influence of socio-economic factors on the participation of youth in agricultural activities. These factors include access to land, capital, education, and the availability of off-farm employment opportunities. The study revealed that the majority of young people involved in agriculture do so primarily due to limited access to other forms of employment. Many of the respondents cited financial constraints as a barrier, making it difficult for them to invest in modern agricultural technologies or even manage larger agricultural operations. This aligns with the findings of previous studies that indicated that limited access to credit and other financial resources significantly hampers youth engagement in agriculture.
The issue of land access also emerged as a crucial factor influencing youth participation. Many respondents reported that they did not have secure access to land, which limited their ability to invest in agricultural production on a larger scale. This problem is particularly significant in regions where land is predominantly controlled by older generations, and the younger generation struggles to gain ownership or rental rights. The difficulty in accessing land has led many youth to seek alternative employment, such as in the informal sector, which further reduces their participation in agriculture.
Education and training also emerged as key determinants of youth involvement in agriculture. The study found that those with formal education and specialized agricultural training were more likely to engage in modern farming practices. However, many youth participants lacked the necessary skills and knowledge to fully exploit the potential of agriculture. This lack of technical expertise prevents them from adopting advanced farming techniques, which could improve productivity and profitability.
Government policies and initiatives aimed at encouraging youth participation in agriculture were found to have a mixed impact. While several programs have been launched to promote youth involvement in the agricultural sector, the findings suggest that these programs have not been as effective as anticipated. Some youth respondents indicated that while the policies existed, they were either poorly implemented or lacked the necessary support systems to make a significant impact.
The National Youth-in-Agriculture Program, for example, was identified by many respondents as an initiative that promised much but often failed to deliver due to bureaucratic inefficiencies and limited resources. Some respondents noted that while the government provided loans or subsidies to young farmers, the process for accessing these resources was cumbersome and inaccessible to most youth, particularly those in rural areas. This lack of effective implementation was seen as a major barrier to youth participation in agriculture.
Additionally, the study found that the agricultural policies in place did not always align with the specific needs and preferences of the youth. While there were policies promoting youth involvement, these policies often failed to address the real challenges faced by young farmers, such as poor infrastructure, inadequate training, and the lack of market access. As a result, many youth viewed agriculture not as a viable career option but as a last resort for employment, further diminishing its attractiveness.
A noteworthy finding from the study is the role of technology in enhancing youth participation in agriculture. It was found that younger farmers who had access to modern agricultural tools and digital platforms were more productive and engaged in agriculture than those relying on traditional farming methods. The use of mobile applications for market information, weather updates, and farming advice significantly improved the efficiency and profitability of young farmers. The findings align with global trends, where digital technologies have been identified as key drivers of agricultural transformation.
However, the study also highlighted that access to technology remains a significant challenge for many young people involved in agriculture. The lack of reliable internet connectivity, especially in rural areas, hindered the widespread adoption of these technologies. Additionally, the high costs associated with acquiring modern equipment and the lack of technical support for using new technologies further alienated many young farmers. This points to the need for more targeted interventions, such as subsidizing the cost of agricultural technologies or providing digital literacy training, to ensure that the benefits of technological advancements are accessible to the youth.
Cultural and social factors also play a significant role in shaping the attitudes of youth toward agriculture. In many communities, farming is often seen as a less prestigious occupation, particularly among young people who aspire to white-collar jobs. This cultural perception was found to be a major deterrent to youth participation in agriculture. Many young people preferred urban migration, hoping to find better opportunities in non-agricultural sectors. The study revealed that young people who engaged in agriculture were often from farming families or communities where agriculture was more deeply embedded in the culture and lifestyle.
Furthermore, gender-related challenges were evident in the study. Female youth, in particular, faced more challenges in accessing agricultural resources, including land and capital, compared to their male counterparts. This gender disparity further compounded the issue of youth involvement in agriculture, as it limited the participation of a significant portion of the youth population.
The study also examined the impact of environmental challenges on youth participation in agriculture. Issues such as climate change, land degradation, and inconsistent rainfall were cited as major constraints affecting agricultural productivity. Youth involved in farming often faced difficulties in adapting to these environmental challenges, which impacted their income and long-term engagement in agriculture. Many respondents indicated that erratic weather patterns made farming increasingly unpredictable, which discouraged investment in agriculture.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the results of the hypotheses tested provide valuable insights into the factors influencing youth participation in agriculture in Nigeria. The first hypothesis, which posited that socio-economic factors significantly impact youth involvement in agriculture, was supported by the findings. The study revealed that access to land, financial resources, and education are key determinants of youth participation. These factors limit opportunities and create barriers that hinder young people’s full engagement in the agricultural sector.
The second hypothesis, which examined the effectiveness of government policies and initiatives in promoting youth participation in agriculture, was only partially supported. While some government programs exist, the study found that their implementation has been less effective due to bureaucratic inefficiencies and lack of access to resources, leading to a limited impact on youth engagement.
Finally, the hypothesis on the role of technological advancements in improving youth participation in agriculture was strongly supported. The use of modern tools, digital platforms, and mobile applications significantly enhanced productivity and engagement among youth involved in agriculture. However, barriers such as limited access to technology in rural areas still pose challenges.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations are made to enhance youth participation in agriculture:
- Improved Access to Land and Financial Resources: The government must implement policies that facilitate easier access to land and financial resources for youth. Programs that provide affordable land leasing options and low-interest loans can help young farmers overcome the financial barriers that limit their involvement in agriculture. Additionally, collaboration with financial institutions to offer agriculture-specific credit schemes will support youth entrepreneurship in the sector.
- Expansion and Effectiveness of Youth-Inclusive Agricultural Policies: There is a need for the government to expand and strengthen existing youth-focused agricultural policies and initiatives. These policies should be designed to address the specific needs of young people, including training, mentorship, and access to modern farming techniques. The government should also streamline the implementation of these programs, ensuring that they reach their target audience and have a measurable impact on youth participation.
- Enhancement of Education and Training in Agriculture: Education and training programs should be tailored to equip youth with the necessary skills to succeed in modern agriculture. Agricultural institutions and training centers should offer practical, hands-on learning experiences that align with current agricultural trends, technologies, and market demands. Encouraging partnerships with universities, research institutions, and NGOs can help facilitate the transfer of knowledge and skills to young farmers.
- Promoting Technological Innovation in Agriculture: The integration of technology in agriculture should be prioritized to enhance youth involvement. Encouraging the use of mobile apps, digital platforms, and modern farming equipment will make agriculture more attractive to young people and increase productivity. Government incentives and support for technological startups in the agricultural sector could further accelerate innovation and youth engagement.
- Community-Based Support and Mentorship Programs: Establishing mentorship and peer support networks for young farmers can help build confidence and foster a sense of community. Older farmers and agricultural experts should be encouraged to mentor the youth, guiding sustainable practices, farm management, and market access. Additionally, fostering a sense of community support can help combat socio-cultural perceptions that discourage youth participation in agriculture.
References
- Adekunle, O. A., Adefalu, L. L., Oladipo, F. O., Adisa, R. S., & Fatoye, A. D. (2021). Constraints to youths’ involvement in agricultural production in Kwara State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 13(1), 102–108.
- Beiske, B. (2017). Research methods: Uses and limitations of questionnaires, interviews, and case studies. GRIN Verlag.
- Bell, J. (2022). Doing your research project: A guide for first-time researchers (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Charan, J., & Biswas, T. (2019). How to calculate sample size for different study designs in medical research? Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 41(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/IJPSYM.IJPSYM_504_18
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Frankfort-Nachmias, C., Nachmias, D., & DeWaard, J. (2021). Research methods in the social sciences (9th ed.). Worth Publishers.
