The Influence of Work Incentives on Office Managers’ Job Performance in an Organisation (A Study of Yaba College of Technology)
Chapter One
Objectives of the Study
The general objective of this study is to assess the influence of work incentives on the job performance of office managers in an organisation, with a focus on Yaba College of Technology.
The specific objectives are:
- To examine the types of work incentives provided to office managers at Yaba College of Technology.
- To evaluate the relationship between work incentives and office managers’ job performance in the college.
- To identify the challenges faced by office managers in receiving or accessing work incentives in the institution.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Preamble
This chapter presents a comprehensive review of relevant literature that provides the foundation for understanding the influence of work incentives on job performance, with a specific focus on office managers. The literature review aims to contextualise the study by examining key concepts, theoretical perspectives, and empirical findings from previous research. It critically analyses the relationship between incentives and performance outcomes, particularly within educational institutions like Yaba College of Technology. The chapter is structured into four major sections: the conceptual framework, the theoretical framework, the empirical review, and a summary highlighting the research gap that this study intends to fill.
Work Incentives
Work incentives refer to the rewards provided by an organisation to enhance employee performance and align their goals with those of the organisation. These incentives are typically classified into two categories: monetary and non-monetary. Monetary incentives encompass tangible rewards such as salaries, bonuses, commissions, profit sharing, and other forms of financial compensation. These rewards serve as immediate economic motivators, driving employees to achieve the objectives of the organisation. Non-monetary incentives, in contrast, refer to intangible rewards, such as recognition, career development opportunities, job enrichment, praise, and flexible working conditions. These incentives aim to fulfill employees’ intrinsic needs, encouraging long-term commitment and job satisfaction.
Scholars have provided various definitions for work incentives. Cohen and Gattiker (2015) define work incentives as any form of compensation—whether tangible or intangible—that enhances an employee’s job performance. Goel, Agrawal, and Sharma (2017) similarly describe work incentives as structured rewards intended to promote job satisfaction and organisational loyalty. These definitions underscore the fundamental role that both monetary and non-monetary rewards play in motivating employees and aligning their efforts with organisational goals.
The practical implications of work incentives are clear, as they can significantly impact employee motivation, job satisfaction, and overall performance. When strategically implemented, incentives can foster a more engaged workforce, reduce turnover rates, and improve organisational culture.
CHAPTER THREE
Advertisements
METHODOLOGY
Preamble
This chapter outlines the methodology used in conducting the study. It provides details about the research design, population, sample size, sampling technique, sources of data collection, research instrument, and method of data analysis. This study aims to investigate the influence of work incentives on the job performance of office managers in academic institutions. A quantitative research approach was adopted to gather objective, measurable data through the use of a survey. This methodology chapter presents the rationale for each methodological choice, ensuring that the research objectives are effectively addressed.
Research Design
The research design adopted for this study is a quantitative survey research design. This design was selected because it allows for the collection of numerical data from a sample that can be analysed statistically to uncover patterns and relationships (Saunders, Lewis, & Thornhill, 2019). A survey design is appropriate as it enables the researcher to assess perceptions, opinions, and attitudes of office managers towards work incentives, as well as their impact on job performance. This design also allows for the collection of data from a large number of respondents in a structured manner, ensuring that the findings are both reliable and valid. Moreover, the use of a survey aligns with the study’s aim of quantifying the influence of various factors on office managers’ performance. The structured approach of the survey ensures objectivity, minimising researcher bias and maximising the accuracy of the data (Bell, 2022).
Population of the Study
The population of the study consists of office managers in academic institutions. The target population includes 100 office managers who work in academic institutions in a specific region, selected for their relevance to the study’s focus. Office managers are chosen because their roles inherently involve a high level of responsibility in administrative functions, making them particularly relevant to the study’s investigation into the impact of work incentives on job performance. Academic institutions were specifically selected as the context for this study due to the structured work environment where work incentives are typically offered. The justification for selecting this population is that office managers in academic settings are directly affected by work incentives, making them an ideal group to study the relationship between incentives and performance.
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
Preamble
Presentation and Analysis of Demographic Variables of Respondents
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
This section provides a comprehensive summary of the key findings derived from the data collected for this study, which sought to explore the types of work incentives provided to office managers at Yaba College of Technology and their impact on job performance. Additionally, the research examined the challenges these office managers face in obtaining work incentives. The results are discussed in relation to the research questions formulated at the outset of the study. The data analyzed from the 80 respondents has provided valuable insights into the institutional practices surrounding work incentives and their effects on job performance and motivation.
The first research question sought to identify the types of work incentives provided to office managers at Yaba College of Technology. Table 4.2 showed that financial incentives, such as bonuses or salary increments, are provided to office managers, with 68.75% of respondents either strongly agreeing or agreeing that the institution provides such incentives. However, 12.5% were uncertain or disagreed, suggesting that while financial incentives are available to many, there may be variations in their application or accessibility.
Non-financial incentives, such as recognition and awards, were reported to be given to office managers as well. According to the data, 68.75% of respondents agreed that non-financial incentives are provided, with 12.5% expressing uncertainty. This finding aligns with previous studies that emphasize the importance of both financial and non-financial rewards in enhancing employee motivation and satisfaction.
Training and development opportunities, which are often seen as key motivational factors, were highlighted by 62.5% of respondents who strongly agreed or agreed that such opportunities are offered. However, there was a noticeable 18.75% uncertainty in this regard, which may point to a gap in communication or accessibility of such programs. Finally, the availability of clear and regular career advancement opportunities was identified as a significant incentive, with 68.75% of respondents agreeing or strongly agreeing that such opportunities are provided.
The second research question focused on how work incentives influence the job performance of office managers. Table 4.3 provided key insights into this area. A majority of respondents (81.25%) agreed that the provision of work incentives positively affects their job performance, with 37.5% strongly agreeing. This finding suggests that work incentives play a critical role in motivating office managers to perform their duties effectively and efficiently.
Financial incentives were identified as strong motivators, with 81.25% of respondents affirming that these incentives enhance job performance. Specifically, 31.25% strongly agreed, and 50% agreed that financial incentives drive office managers to perform their tasks with greater efficiency. Similarly, non-financial incentives, such as recognition and awards, were also found to positively influence job performance, with 68.75% of respondents agreeing that such incentives improve their work outcomes.
Career advancement opportunities were reported as significant motivators, with 75% of respondents either strongly agreeing or agreeing that these opportunities are key drivers of performance improvement. This finding underscores the importance of long-term career development in motivating office managers to strive for higher levels of performance.
The third research question sought to examine the challenges office managers face in obtaining work incentives. Table 4.4 revealed that delays in receiving financial incentives were a concern for 56.25% of respondents, with 25% strongly agreeing and 31.25% agreeing that these delays exist. This is a clear indication that while financial incentives are provided, there may be systemic or administrative issues that hinder the timely distribution of these rewards.
Another key challenge identified was a lack of transparency in the distribution of non-financial incentives. The data showed that 56.25% of respondents expressed concerns about transparency, with 18.75% strongly agreeing and 37.5% agreeing. This suggests that while non-financial rewards are provided, the process may not be entirely clear to all office managers, leading to potential dissatisfaction and a perception of unfairness in the distribution process.
Career advancement opportunities were also highlighted as a challenge for office managers, with 62.5% of respondents agreeing that they face difficulties accessing these opportunities. This finding suggests that while the institution offers career advancement programs, office managers may encounter barriers such as limited availability, lack of information, or other institutional constraints.
Finally, the administrative process for receiving work incentives was identified as overly complex by 62.5% of respondents. This complexity may discourage office managers from fully utilising the available incentives, thereby reducing the effectiveness of the incentive programs. This finding suggests that streamlining administrative procedures could enhance the utilisation and impact of work incentives.
Conclusion
This study sought to explore the types of work incentives provided to office managers at Yaba College of Technology, their impact on job performance, and the challenges office managers face in obtaining these incentives. The findings indicate that both financial and non-financial incentives, such as salary increments, bonuses, recognition, and awards, are provided to office managers. Additionally, training and development opportunities and career advancement prospects were also highlighted as significant work incentives.
The study further revealed that these incentives positively influence job performance, with the majority of respondents agreeing that financial incentives, non-financial incentives, and career advancement opportunities motivate office managers to improve their work outcomes. However, despite these positive findings, several challenges were identified, including delays in receiving financial incentives, lack of transparency in the distribution of non-financial rewards, difficulties in accessing career advancement opportunities, and complex administrative procedures that discourage the effective utilisation of work incentives.
In conclusion, while Yaba College of Technology offers a range of work incentives that contribute to improved job performance, addressing the identified challenges, such as improving transparency, reducing delays, and streamlining administrative processes—would further enhance the effectiveness of these incentives and ensure greater satisfaction and motivation among office managers.
Recommendations
The following recommendations are proposed based on the findings of this study:
- Enhance Transparency in Incentive Distribution: Based on the findings that a lack of transparency in the distribution of non-financial incentives exists, it is recommended that the institution implement clear and transparent processes for distributing awards and recognition. A well-structured system that outlines criteria for awards, recognition, and promotions will not only motivate office managers but also reduce perceptions of unfairness.
- Improve Timeliness of Financial Incentives: The study found that delays in receiving financial incentives were a significant challenge. Therefore, it is recommended that Yaba College of Technology streamline its financial incentive processes to ensure timely payments of bonuses, salary increments, and other financial rewards. Regular monitoring and clear communication about the timelines for these incentives will contribute to better satisfaction among office managers.
- Simplify Administrative Processes: The complexity of administrative procedures for accessing work incentives discourages office managers from fully utilizing available incentives. It is recommended that the institution simplify these administrative processes, making them more efficient and user-friendly. Clear guidelines and an accessible point of contact for assistance will improve the overall experience of office managers in accessing their benefits.
- Increase Career Advancement Opportunities: While career advancement is seen as a motivator, the study indicates that office managers face challenges in accessing these opportunities. Therefore, it is recommended that the institution provide more structured and accessible career development programs. This could include mentorship schemes, leadership training, and a clear path for career progression that is open to all office managers based on merit.
Limitations of the Study
Despite providing valuable insights, this study has several limitations. First, the research was conducted at Yaba College of Technology, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to other institutions or sectors. The sample size, though adequate for the study, might not fully represent the broader population of office managers across various institutions, potentially introducing sampling bias. Additionally, the study relied on self-reported data, which is subject to respondent bias, as participants may have provided socially desirable answers. The study also focused primarily on office managers and did not account for other categories of staff, which may have yielded a more comprehensive understanding of the incentives system. Furthermore, the study’s cross-sectional design only captures a snapshot of the current situation and does not provide insights into long-term trends or changes in the incentive system over time. Lastly, the study did not explore the perspectives of the institution’s management, which could provide a more balanced view of the challenges and benefits of the current work incentive policies.
References
- Agburu, J. I. (2017). Recent trends in wage and salary administration in Nigeria: A synopsis on theoretical and empirical challenges. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 1(2), 257–268.
- Baqir, M., Hussain, S., Waseem, R., & Anwarul-Islam, K. M. (2020). Impact of reward and recognition, supervisor support on employee engagement. American International Journal of Business and Management Studies, 2(3), 8–21.
- Bell, E. (2022). Business research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Bernardin, H. J. (2019). Human resource management: An experiential approach. Tata McGraw-Hill.
- Bloomenthal, A. (2019). Careers, salaries and compensation: Bonus. Investopedia, 5(6), 6.
- Cohen, A., & Gattiker, U. E. (2015). Rewards and organisational commitment across structural characteristics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 34(47), 94–104.
- Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
- Eneh, S. I., Nwekpa, K. C., & Udu, G. O. C. (2018). Salary increase and employee productivity in cement manufacturing companies in South-South, Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 20(10), 01–08.
