Political Science Project Topics

Adapting Emerging Political Interests and Trends in Professional Practice of Sports: a Case of Sports Federation Politics for Sustainable National Development

Adapting Emerging Political Interests and Trends in Professional Practice of Sports a Case of Sports Federation Politics for Sustainable National Development

Adapting Emerging Political Interests and Trends in Professional Practice of Sports a Case of Sports Federation Politics for Sustainable National Development


Objectives of the Study

The specific objectives of this study are to:

  1. Examine the influence of emerging political interests on the professional practice of sports federations.
  2. Analyze the impact of political trends on the governance structures of sports federations.
  3. Assess the role of sports federation politics in fostering sustainable national development.



Conceptual Review

Sports Federation Politics

Sports federation politics encompasses the complex interplay of power dynamics, decision-making processes, and governance structures within organizations responsible for overseeing and regulating sports activities (McLeod et al., 2021b). At its core, sports federation politics involves the negotiation of interests and priorities among various stakeholders, including athletes, administrators, government bodies, sponsors, and the broader sporting community (Walker, Machold, & Ahmed, 2021). The scope of sports federation politics extends beyond mere administrative functions, as it shapes the direction, policies, and resource allocation within the sports ecosystem (McLeod & Shilbury, 2020). This includes the formulation of rules and regulations, the allocation of funding and resources, and the representation of interests at local, national, and international levels (Kihl, 2020).

The evolution of sports federation politics has been marked by significant transformations over time (Perkins & Shilbury, 2022). Historically, sports organizations were often characterized by centralized decision-making structures and limited stakeholder participation (McLeod & Shilbury, 2020). However, with the advent of globalization, democratization, and increased public scrutiny, sports federations have undergone a paradigm shift towards greater transparency, accountability, and inclusivity (Shilbury & Ferkins, 2020). This evolution reflects broader societal trends towards participatory governance and the recognition of the rights and interests of diverse stakeholders within the sports domain (Adriaanse & Schofield, 2021).

Key actors and stakeholders play pivotal roles in shaping the dynamics of sports federation politics (O’Boyle & Shilbury, 2016a). These include athletes, coaches, administrators, government agencies, sponsors, media outlets, and fans, each with their own set of interests, motivations, and power dynamics (McLeod et al., 2020). Athletes, as the primary beneficiaries and contributors to the sports ecosystem, wield considerable influence over decision-making processes and policy formulation (Lee & Cunningham, 2019). Administrators and officials within sports federations hold significant power in setting the agenda, enforcing rules, and managing resources (Perkins & Shilbury, 2020). Government agencies and policymakers often play a regulatory role, providing funding, infrastructure, and oversight to ensure compliance with legal and ethical standards (Philippe et al., 2019). Sponsors and media entities exert influence through financial investments, branding opportunities, and media coverage, shaping the commercial landscape of sports (Swanson & Kent, 2017). Finally, fans and grassroots supporters contribute to the legitimacy and sustainability of sports federations through their engagement, loyalty, and advocacy efforts (Claringbould & Knoppers, 2020).




Introduction to Research

In conducting this study, a quantitative research design was employed to explore the relationship between emerging political interests, sports federation politics, and their impact on national development. This approach was chosen due to its ability to gather numerical data that can be analyzed statistically, providing objective insights into the research questions posed. The quantitative survey research design was deemed appropriate as it allows for the collection of data from a large sample size, facilitating generalizability and enabling the identification of patterns and associations within the dataset (Saunders et al., 2019; Creswell & Creswell, 2018).

Research Design

The research design involves the systematic planning and execution of data collection and analysis methods to address the research objectives effectively. The choice of a quantitative survey research design was justified based on the need to quantify the relationships between variables and test hypotheses derived from the research questions (Bell, 2022). This design enables the measurement of specific constructs related to emerging political interests, sports federation politics, and national development, allowing for statistical analysis to identify patterns and trends (Creswell & Creswell, 2018).

Population of the Study

The target population for this study comprised individuals directly involved in sports federations, including administrators, policymakers, athletes, coaches, and other relevant stakeholders. The justification for this target population of 171 respondents lies in their direct influence on the dynamics of sports federation politics and their potential contributions to national development agendas. By surveying individuals actively engaged in sports governance and management, the study aimed to capture diverse perspectives and insights into the research topic (Robson, 2020).



Data Presentation



Summary of Findings

The study delved into various aspects of sports federation politics, aiming to uncover its influence on professional practices, governance structures, and national development. Through a combination of quantitative surveys and data analysis, several key findings emerged, shedding light on the intricate relationship between sports federation politics and broader societal dynamics.

Firstly, regarding the influence of emerging political interests on sports federations, the findings revealed a mixed perception among respondents. While a significant portion acknowledged the impact of political interests on professional practices and governance structures, there was also uncertainty and disagreement among others. This ambiguity underscores the complexity of navigating political dynamics within sports federations, which can both enhance and hinder their operations.

Secondly, concerning the correlation between political trends and transparency/accountability within sports federations, the results suggested a nuanced understanding among respondents. While a majority acknowledged some level of influence, there were divergent opinions regarding the extent of this influence. This variability highlights the multifaceted nature of governance in sports, where political trends can shape transparency and accountability practices to varying degrees.

Thirdly, in terms of the contribution of sports federation politics to sustainable national development, the findings portrayed a landscape marked by uncertainty and divergence of opinions. While many respondents expressed scepticism about the direct impact of sports federation politics on national development, others emphasized its potential role as a catalyst for socio-economic progress. This disparity underscores the need for further research to elucidate the complex interplay between sports governance and broader development agendas.

Overall, the study’s findings underscore the multifaceted nature of sports federation politics and its implications for professional practices, governance structures, and national development. While there are prevailing perceptions and trends, there is also significant variability and ambiguity in respondents’ perspectives. This highlights the need for nuanced approaches to understanding and navigating the complexities of sports governance, with implications for policymakers, sports administrators, and researchers alike.


In conclusion, the findings of the hypotheses testing provide valuable insights into the intricate relationship between sports federation politics and various dimensions of sports governance and national development. The results revealed nuanced perceptions among respondents regarding the influence of emerging political interests on decision-making processes within sports federations. While there were indications of some level of impact, the variability in responses underscores the complex nature of navigating political dynamics within sports governance structures.

Similarly, the examination of the correlation between political trends and transparency/accountability within sports federations yielded mixed findings, highlighting the diverse perspectives among respondents. While some acknowledged the influence of political trends on governance practices, others expressed scepticism or uncertainty about the extent of this impact. This variability underscores the need for tailored approaches to enhance transparency and accountability in sports governance, taking into account the unique socio-political contexts within which sports federations operate.

Furthermore, the analysis of the contribution of sports federation politics to sustainable national development revealed a spectrum of opinions among respondents. While some emphasized the potential role of sports governance in fostering socio-economic progress, others expressed doubts about its direct impact. Overall, the findings underscore the complexity of sports governance dynamics and highlight the importance of context-specific approaches to addressing governance challenges and maximizing the potential contributions of sports federations to broader societal development agendas.


Based on the findings and analysis presented in this study, the following recommendations are proposed:

  1. Enhance Transparency and Accountability: Sports federations should implement robust mechanisms to enhance transparency and accountability in decision-making processes. This includes regularly publishing financial reports, ensuring open communication channels with stakeholders, and establishing independent oversight bodies to monitor governance practices.
  2. Strengthen Governance Structures: Sports federations should invest in strengthening their governance structures to withstand external political pressures. This may involve implementing governance reforms, adopting best practices from other industries, and ensuring a diverse and independent board of directors.
  3. Promote Stakeholder Engagement: Encourage active participation of stakeholders, including athletes, coaches, fans, and government representatives, in the governance of sports federations. This can be achieved through regular consultations, feedback mechanisms, and inclusive decision-making processes.
  4. Invest in Capacity Building: Provide training and capacity-building programs for sports administrators and board members to enhance their skills in governance, leadership, and ethical decision-making. This will help ensure that sports federations are equipped to navigate complex political environments effectively.
  5. Foster Collaboration: Foster collaboration and partnerships between sports federations, government agencies, civil society organizations, and other stakeholders to leverage resources and expertise for the development of sports and national development initiatives.
  6. Promote Gender Diversity: Take proactive measures to promote gender diversity and inclusion within sports federations, including setting targets for the representation of women in leadership positions and implementing policies to address gender bias and discrimination.
  7. Advocate for Autonomy: Advocate for the autonomy of sports federations from political interference to safeguard their independence and integrity. This may involve lobbying for legislative reforms, building public awareness, and garnering support from international sports bodies.
  8. Monitor and Evaluate Impact: Establish mechanisms to monitor and evaluate the impact of governance reforms and initiatives on the development of sports and national development outcomes. This will help assess progress, identify areas for improvement, and ensure accountability to stakeholders.


  • Adriaanse, J. A. (2017). Quotas to accelerate gender equity in sport leadership: Do they work? In L. J. Burton & S. Leberman (Eds.), Women in Sport Leadership (pp. 97–111). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Adriaanse, J. A. (2020). Gender diversity in the governance of sports associations: The Sydney Scoreboard Global Index of Participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(1), 149–160.
  • Adriaanse, J. A., & Schofield, T. (2021). Analysing gender dynamics in sport governance: A new regimes-based approach. Sport Management Review, 16(4), 498–513.
  • Beiske, B. (2017). Research Methods: Uses and Limitations of Questionnaires, Interviews and Case Studies. GRIN Verlag.
  • Bell, E. (2022). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business Research Methods (5th Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. SAGE publications.
  • Boder, A. (2020). Collective intelligence: A keystone in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(1), 81–93.
  • Chappelet, J. L. (2018). Beyond governance: The need to improve the regulation of international sport. Sport in Society, 21(5), 724–734.
  • Chappelet, J. L., & Mrkonjic, M. (2019). Assessing sport governance principles and indicators. In M. Winand & C. Anagnostopoulos (Eds.), Research Handbook on Sport Governance (pp. 10–29). Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Charmaz, K. (2016). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
  • Claringbould, I., & Knoppers, A. (2020). Doing and undoing gender in sports governance. Sex Roles, 58(1–2), 81–92.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (5th Ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE.
  • Doherty, A., & Carron, A. (2021). Cohesion in volunteer sport executive committees. Journal of Sport Management, 17(2), 116–141.
  • Dowling, M., Leopkey, B., & Smith, L. (2018). Governance in sport: A scoping review. Journal of Sport Management, 32(5), 438–451.
  • Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. R. (2018). Management and Business Research. London: Sage.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (2015). Building Theories From Case Study Research. Academy Of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
  • Perkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2020). Developing board strategic capability in sport organisations: The national–regional governing relationship. Sport Management Review, 13(3), 235–254.
  • Perkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2020). Theoretical underpinnings of sport governance. In D. Shilbury & L. Perkins (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Sports Governance (pp. 18–32). Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Perkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2021). Board strategic balance: An emerging sport governance theory. Sport Management Review, 18(4), 489–500.
  • Perkins, L., & Shilbury, D. (2022). Good boards are strategic: What does that mean for sports governance? Journal of Sport Management, 26(1), 67–80.
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!