Food Science and Technology Project Topics

Antinutritional Composition of Fermented and Unfermented Sweet Potato-pigeon Pea Weaning Food

Antinutritional Composition of Fermented and Unfermented Sweet Potato-pigeon Pea Weaning Food

Antinutritional Composition of Fermented and Unfermented Sweet Potato-pigeon Pea Weaning Food

Chapter One

Objectives of the study

The objectives of the study include the following:

  1. to produce fermented and unfermented sweet potato-pigeon pea weaning food
  2. to evaluate the antinutritional composition of the samples

CHAPTER TWO

 LITERATURE REVIEW

Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas)

            Sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas L. (Lam.), is an important economic crop in many countries. In terms of annual production, sweet potato ranks as the fifth most important food crop in the tropics and the seventh in the world food production after wheat, rice, maize, potato, barley, and cassava (FAO, 2016). Sweet potato fulfills a number of basic roles in the global food system, all of which have fundamental implications for meeting food requirements, reducing poverty, and increasing food security (El‐Sheikha and Ray, 2017). Sweet potato roots have high nutritional value and sensory versatility in terms of taste, texture, and flesh color (white, cream, yellow, orange, purple). The varieties with high dry matter (>25%), white‐cream flesh color, and mealy firm texture after cooking are preferred by the consumers in the tropics. These varieties are known as tropical sweetpotato (e.g., “bianito,” “batiste,” or “camote”). The purple‐fleshed sweet potato varieties with attractive color and high anthocyanin content are the specialty type in Asia.

In the United States, the commercially popular type is the orange‐fleshed sweet potato with low dry matter content (18–25%), high β‐carotene level, sweet and moist‐texture after cooking. This sweet potato type is imprecisely called “yam,” which is not the true tropical yam of Dioscorea species. Historically, African Americans in Louisiana referred this moist‐ sweet potato as “nyami” because it reminded them of the starchy tuber of that name in Africa. The Senagalese word “nyami” was eventually shortened to the trademark “yam” popular in the United States. Commercial packages with “yam” labels are required by the US Department of Agriculture to have the word “sweet potato” in the label to avoid confusion to the consumers (Estes, 2009).

Depending on the flesh color, sweet potatoes contain high levels of β‐carotene, anthocyanins, phenolics, dietary fiber, vitamins, minerals, and other bioactive compounds. The β‐carotene in orange‐fleshed sweet potatoes can play a significant role as a viable long‐term food‐based strategy for combating vitamin A deficiency in the world. Studies in Africa demonstrated that increased consumption of orange‐fleshed sweet potatoes improved the vitamin A status of children, pregnant women, and lactating mothers (Van Jaarsveld et al., 2005; Low et al., 2007; Hotz et al., 2012).

Production and consumption of sweet potato

            Sweet potato has wide production geography, from 40° north to 32° south latitude of the globe, and it is cultivated in 114 countries. The world total production of sweet potatoes was 106.60 million metric tons (MMT) in 2014. Since the mid‐2000s, global production has ranged from a low of 101.28 MMT in 2007 to a high of 147.17 MMT in 1999. In 2014, about three‐fourth of the global production was from Asia and Pacific Islands, followed by Africa with about 21%, while the Americas (North, Central, and South) account for about 3.6%. China was the leading producer of sweet potatoes, with 71.54 MMT or about 67% of the global production, followed by Nigeria (3.78 MMT), Tanzania (3.5 MMT), Ethiopia (2.7 MMT), and Mozambique (2.4 MMT). The United States was the tenth largest producer, with 1.34 MMT production. Only two countries in Europe, Portugal and Spain, grow sweet potatoes, with 22,591 and 13,550 metric tons produced in 2014 (FAO, 2015).

In comparison to other major staple food crops, sweet potatoes have good adaptability to marginal growing conditions, short production cycle, and high yield potential. The average world yield of sweet potatoes is about 14 tons per hectare. Under subsistence conditions in many areas of the tropics, the average sweet potato yield is about 6 metric tons/hectare, far below the 20–26 metric tons/hectare obtained in China, Japan, and the United States, where improved varieties, fertilizer applications, and cultural managements have been introduced. The per capita consumption is highest in places where sweet potatoes are consumed as a staple food, e.g., Papua New Guinea at 550 kg per person per year, the Solomon Islands at 160 kg, Burundi and Rwanda at 130 kg, and Uganda at 85 kg. The average annual per capita consumption of sweet potatoes is estimated at 18 kg in Asia, 9 kg in Africa, 5 kg in Latin America. Between 2000 and 2014, sweet potato consumption in the United States increased nearly 80%, from 1.9 kg to 3.4 kg per capita (FAO, 2015; Johnson et al., 2015).

Sweet potato consumption has been greatly enhanced by the wide spread commercial availability of frozen “French‐fried” sweet potatoes. To accommodate this recent growth trend, increased modern processing capacity has been built within the southern US sweet potato growing regions (Johnson et al., 2015).

Classification and origin of sweet potato

            The sweet potato (I. batatas L.) is a dicotyledonous plant belonging to the morning glory or Convolvulaceae family. It is a new world crop, though there is still some confusion that exists regarding its origin, and primary and secondary centers of diversity. Roullier et al. (2013a, b) and Grüneberg et al. (2015) have published thorough reviews of this topic. In brief, using data from morphology, ecology, and cytology, Austin (2008) has postulated that cultivated sweet potatoes originated somewhere in the region between the Yucatan Peninsula of Mexico and the mouth of the Orinoco river in northeastern Venezuela. Recent studies conducted by Roullier et al. (2013 a, b) incorporating chloroplast DNA and molecular phylogeny analyses confirm this hypothesis. They also suggest that I. batatas most likely evolved from at least two distinct autopolyploidization events in wild populations of a single progenitor species most likely I. trifida. Secondary contact between sweet potatoes domesticated in Central America and in South America, from differentiated wild I. batatas or I. trifida populations, could have led to further introgression. Molecular marker analyses conducted by Huang and Sun (2000) and Zhang et  al. (2000) also places Central America as the region with the most genetic diversity and probable origin (Huang and Sun, 2000; Zhang et al., 2000).

Remains of dried sweetpotato roots found in Peru have been radiocarbon dated back to 8,000–10,000 years old, though it is unknown if these were collected from the wild or were domesticated (Engel, 2000). Regardless of the center of origin, sweetpotato was widely established in tropical regions of the new world around 2500 b.c. (Austin, 2008). It was established in Polynesia, prior to European arrival (Roullier et al., 2013b). Europeans in the 1500s spread the sweet potato to Africa and India, with it arriving in China prior to 1600. Secondary centers of diversity include New Guinea, the Philippines, and parts of Africa (Bohac et al., 2005; Roullier et al., 2013a, b).

 Nutritional composition of sweet potatoes

            All the plant parts, roots, vines, and young leaves of sweet potatoes are used as foods, animal feeds and traditional medicine around the world (Mohanraj and Sivasankar, 2014). In Asia and Africa, the sweet potato leaves are eaten as green vegetables. The nutrient content of sweet potato leaves varies among the varieties, harvest dates, crop years and cooking methods. On dry weight basis, sweet potato leaves contain 25–37% protein, 42–61% carbohydrate, 2–5% crude fat, 23–38% total dietary fiber, 60–200 mg/100 g ascorbic acid, and 60–120 mg/100 g carotene (Almazan et al., 2007, Sun et al., 2014). They are also rich in calcium (230–1,958 mg/100 g), iron (2–22 mg), potassium (479–5,230 mg), and magnesium (220–910 mg). The high level of phenolics (1.4–17.1 mg/100 g dry weight), anthocyanins, and radical‐scavenging activities in sweetpotato leaves indicates their potential benefits on human health and nutrition (Islam, 2006, Truong et al., 2007). Sweetpotato greens are very rich in lutein, 38–51 mg/100 g in fresh leaves, which are even higher than the lutein levels in the vegetables that are known as a source for lutein, such as kale (38 mg/100 g) and spinach (12 mg/100 g) (Menelaou et al., 2006).

Novel galactolipids were recently isolated and characterized from sweet potato leaves (Napolitano et al., 2007), indicating that this leafy vegetable can be a potential source of omega‐3 polyunsaturated fatty acid. Health benefits and disease prevention of bioactive compounds in sweet potato leaves have been reported (Johnson and Pace, 2010). The nutrient composition of sweet potato roots varies widely, depending on the cultivar, growing conditions, maturity, and storage. Overall, sweet potato roots have a high moisture level with an average dry matter content of 25–30%. A wide range of dry matter content of 13–45% from a sweet potato germplasm collection was reported by Tsou and Hong (2002) and Brabet et al. (1998). sweet potato roots are good source of carbohydrates and generally low in protein and fat. Protein content ranged from 1.73–9.14% on dry weight with substantial levels of nonprotein nitrogen (Yeoh and Truong, 2006).

 

CHAPTER THREE

  MATERIALS AND METHODS

 Materials

Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) and Pigeon pea (Cajanus cajam) used in the research work was purchased from a local market in Owo, Ondo State. The samples were processed in Chemistry Laboratory, Federal University of Technology, Akure, Ondo State, Nigeria

  Methods

Preparation of fermented sweet potato-pigeon pea flour

Fresh sweet potato root were washed, peeled, sliced and pigeon pea seeds were winnowed, sorted, drained. The two cleaned samples (sliced sweet potato root and washed pigeon pea were soaked together i.e fermented together for 72 hours. After 72 hours the fermented samples it was washed, wet milled, sieved, sedimented for 24 hours, drained, sun dried for 3 days and dry milled into powder, sieved and packaged in airtight container for further analysis (Fig. 1).

CHAPTER FOUR

 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Results

Table 4.1: Antinutritional composition of fermented and unfermented sweet potato-pigeon pea weaning food

 

CHAPTER FIVE

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMMENDATIONS

 Conclusion

Antinutritional factors in foods are responsible for the deleterious effects that are related to the absorption of nutrients and micronutrients which may interfere with the function of certain organs. The study evaluate the antinutritional composition of fermented and unfermented of sweet potato-pigeon pea weaning food, from the results revealed it was noted that the unfermented weaning food has higher content of all the antinutrient, the highest antinutrient in both samples were saponins, phenols, oxalate (USPWF) and phytate. The antinutrient with least value as observed were tannins, flavonoids and oxalate (FSPWF). In conclusion, the processing employed in processing food products as some certain effect on the antinutritional factor of the raw materials used for the food products, evidently fermentation is one the processing methods that help reduced the antinutritional in food products. Therefore, fermented sweet potato-pigeon pea weaning food can be considered the best option for infant consumption due to low antinutrient.

Recommendation

Based on the findings above it is therefore recommended that fermentation should be used for processing food products especially if the raw materials contain legumes, this will reduce antinutrient present, hence utilization of the nutrient present by the body.

REFERENCES

  • Agona, J.A. and Muyinza, H. (2005). ‘Promotion of improved handling, processing, utilization and marketing of pigeonpea in Apac district’, Technical Report. DFID – NARO Client Oriented Research Fund 2006 Project.
  • Aja, P.M., Alum, E.U., Ezeani, N.N., Nwali, B.U. and Edwin, N. (2015a). Comparative Phytochemical Composition of Cajanus cajan Leaf and Seed. Int J Micr Res 6: 42-46.
  • Aja, P.M., Igwenyi, I.O., Ugwu-Okechukwu, P.C., Orji, O.U. and Alum, E.U. (2015b). Evaluation of Anti-diabetic effect and liver function indices of ethanol extracts of Moringa oleifera and cajanus cajan leaves in alloxan induced diabetic albino rats. Global Veterinaria 14: 439-447.
  • Akinola, J.O. and Whiteman, P.C. (2005). Agronomic studies on pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp). 3. Responses to defoliation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26: 67 – 79.
  • Akinola, J.O., Whiteman, P.C. and Wallis, E.S. (2005). T h e agronomy of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan). Review Series no. 1/2005, CAB International, UK. 57 pp.
  • Akporhonor, E.E., Egwaikhide, P.A. and Eguavoen, I.O. (2006). Effect of spouting on in-vitro digestibility of some locally consumed leguminous seeds. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manage. 10(3):55-58
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!