Human Kinetics and Physical Education Project Topics

Comparative Analysis of Functional Capacity of Human Kinetics Students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University Athletes

Comparative Analysis of Functional Capacity of Human Kinetics Students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University Athletes

Comparative Analysis of Functional Capacity of Human Kinetics Students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University Athletes


Objectives of the Study

This research has three specific objectives:

  1. To assess and compare the cardiovascular endurance of Human Kinetics students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University athletes.
  2. To evaluate and compare the muscular strength of Human Kinetics students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University athletes.
  3. To examine and compare the flexibility and body composition of Human Kinetics students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University athletes.



Conceptual Review

Definition and Components of Physical Fitness

Physical fitness is a multifaceted concept encompassing several components that collectively contribute to an individual’s overall health and well-being (Caspersen, Powell, & Christenson, 2017). These components represent various physiological and functional aspects of the human body, each playing a crucial role in determining one’s fitness level. Understanding the definition and components of physical fitness is fundamental as it provides a comprehensive framework for assessing an individual’s health and physical capabilities.

Cardiovascular endurance, also known as aerobic fitness, is a critical component of physical fitness (American College of Sports Medicine [ACSM], 2018). It pertains to the ability of the cardiovascular system to efficiently transport oxygen to working muscles during prolonged physical activity (ACSM, 2018). This component is typically assessed through tests like the VO2 max test, which measures an individual’s maximal oxygen consumption. High levels of cardiovascular endurance are associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases and improved overall health (ACSM, 2018).

Muscular strength, another integral component, refers to the maximum force a muscle or group of muscles can generate (ACSM, 2018). It is assessed through exercises like weightlifting or resistance training. Muscular strength is crucial for performing everyday tasks, preventing injuries, and maintaining bone health (ACSM, 2018). Furthermore, it plays a vital role in athletic performance, allowing athletes to generate the power and explosiveness required in many sports (Jones et al., 2019).

Flexibility is the third component of physical fitness, focusing on the range of motion around a joint or group of joints (ACSM, 2018). Adequate flexibility ensures that muscles and tendons can move freely without restrictions. Flexibility exercises, such as stretching routines, help improve joint mobility, reduce the risk of injuries, and enhance overall functional capacity (ACSM, 2018). For athletes, flexibility is particularly crucial in sports that demand a wide range of motion, such as gymnastics or dance (Jones et al., 2019).

Finally, body composition is an essential component that refers to the proportion of fat, muscle, and bone mass in the body (ACSM, 2018). It is assessed by measuring body fat percentage and is a critical determinant of overall health and fitness. Maintaining a healthy body composition, with an appropriate balance between lean muscle and body fat, is associated with a reduced risk of chronic diseases, improved metabolic health, and enhanced physical performance (Coutts, 2016).

In summary, the definition and components of physical fitness are foundational to assessing and improving an individual’s health and performance. Cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength, flexibility, and body composition collectively represent the key facets of physical fitness. These components are interrelated, and improvements in one area often lead to enhancements in others. Recognizing the importance of these components provides a basis for developing effective fitness programs, whether for students studying Human Kinetics or for university athletes striving to excel in their respective sports.




This chapter outlines the research methodology employed to achieve the objectives of this study, which seeks to conduct a comparative analysis of the physical fitness levels of Human Kinetics students and university athletes. The choice of an appropriate research design, population, sampling technique, data collection methods, and data analysis tools is pivotal to ensure the reliability and validity of the study’s findings.

Research Design

The research design for this study is quantitative, as it involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to answer specific research questions (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). A quantitative survey research design is chosen for its ability to provide a structured approach for collectog data from a sizable sample efficiently (Saunders et al., 2019). This design allows for the comparison of physical fitness components between Human Kinetics students and university athletes, addressing the research objectives effectively.

The quantitative survey research design is particularly apt for this study’s goals, as it enables a structured approach to gather data systematically and comprehensively (Creswell & Creswell, 2018). The extensive and structured nature of this research method ensures that a substantial volume of data can be collected efficiently, making it ideal for a comparative analysis of physical fitness attributes between Human Kinetics students and university athletes. This design permits the generation of quantitative data that can be subjected to statistical analyses, thereby enabling the study to draw meaningful conclusions regarding potential differences in physical fitness components among these two distinct groups. In summary, the choice of a quantitative survey research design reflects a deliberate strategy to conduct a methodical investigation of physical fitness attributes, aligning with the study’s overarching research objectives (Saunders et al., 2019).



Data Presentation



Summary of Findings

The study aimed to investigate and compare various aspects of physical fitness, including cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength, flexibility, and body composition, between Human Kinetics students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University athletes. The research employed a quantitative survey design and gathered data through questionnaires from a sample of 104 respondents. The findings are summarized in the following paragraphs.

Table 4.8 presents respondents’ perceptions of the cardiovascular endurance of Human Kinetics students compared to that of university athletes. Notably, 67.3% of participants either strongly agreed or agreed that Human Kinetics students demonstrated superior cardiovascular endurance. This perception is further supported by the fact that only 20.2% of respondents disagreed or strongly disagreed with this statement.

Furthermore, Table 4.9 explored whether respondents believed there were significant disparities in cardiovascular endurance between the two groups. The majority of participants (73.1%) either strongly agreed or agreed that such differences existed, reinforcing the perception that Human Kinetics students excel in cardiovascular endurance.

However, in Table 4.10, when asked if Human Kinetics students’ cardiovascular endurance matches up well with that of university athletes, respondents’ views were more evenly distributed. While 68.3% of participants agreed or strongly agreed, a notable 27.9% remained uncertain or disagreed. This suggests a level of uncertainty regarding the degree of match in cardiovascular endurance.


In conclusion, the results of the hypotheses tested in this study provide valuable insights into the perceptions and evaluations of physical fitness components among Human Kinetics students and Nnamdi Azikiwe University athletes. The findings support several key conclusions.

Firstly, there is a significant difference in cardiovascular endurance between the two groups, with a majority of respondents perceiving Human Kinetics students as having superior cardiovascular endurance. This aligns with the hypothesis tested, which posited such a difference.

Secondly, the study confirms a significant difference in muscular strength between Human Kinetics students and university athletes, as perceived by the majority of respondents. This outcome is consistent with the research hypothesis, indicating that these two groups indeed exhibit distinct levels of muscular strength.

Thirdly, the study reveals noticeable differences in flexibility and body composition between the two groups, in line with the research hypothesis. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the extent of match in flexibility.

Overall, these findings shed light on the perceived disparities in physical fitness components and highlight the strengths and weaknesses of Human Kinetics students and university athletes. Understanding these differences can inform tailored training and education programs to enhance the overall physical fitness and performance of these distinct groups.


Based on the findings of the study, several recommendations can be made to improve our understanding of physical fitness components and better support Human Kinetics students and university athletes:

  1. Tailored Training Programs: Develop specialized training programs for Human Kinetics students and university athletes to address the identified disparities in cardiovascular endurance and muscular strength. These programs should focus on improving the specific areas where each group lags.
  2. Cross-Training Opportunities: Create opportunities for cross-training between Human Kinetics students and university athletes. This will allow students to gain practical experience in athletic conditioning and athletes to benefit from the scientific knowledge imparted by Human Kinetics programs.
  3. Regular Assessments: Implement regular fitness assessments for both groups to track their progress over time. These assessments can help identify improvements or areas of concern and guide the adaptation of training and education programs.
  4. Educational Integration: Integrate theoretical knowledge with practical training for Human Kinetics students. By experiencing the physical demands of their field, students can better appreciate the real-world application of their studies.
  5. Sports Science Education: Expand the curriculum for university athletes to include elements of sports science and exercise physiology. This can enhance their understanding of physical fitness and help them make informed decisions about their training regimens.
  6. Diversity in Sport Participation: Encourage athletes to diversify their participation in various sports. This can help improve their overall fitness by targeting different muscle groups and energy systems.
  7. Peer Mentorship Programs: Establish peer mentorship programs where advanced athletes can mentor Human Kinetics students and vice versa. This will foster a culture of knowledge exchange and skill development.
  8. Fitness Facility Access: Ensure that both groups have continued access to fitness facilities or gyms. Adequate facilities are crucial for maintaining and improving physical fitness levels.

Contribution to Knowledge

The findings of this study provide valuable contributions to the fields of physical fitness, education, and sports science. One of the primary contributions lies in the comprehensive comparative analysis it offers. By examining physical fitness components such as cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength, flexibility, and body composition in both Human Kinetics students and university athletes, the study sheds light on their relative strengths and weaknesses. This nuanced understanding helps bridge the gap between academic knowledge and practical training, offering insights into how tailored regimens can enhance physical fitness.

Moreover, this research underscores the importance of cross-disciplinary collaboration. It emphasizes the potential benefits of bringing Human Kinetics students and university athletes together, facilitating the exchange of knowledge and expertise. This approach can enrich the educational experience for students and provide athletes with valuable insights from the realm of exercise science. The study’s recommendation for enhanced collaboration between these two groups opens up new avenues for cross-pollination of ideas and practices.

Furthermore, the call for longitudinal research to track the progress of both Human Kinetics students and university athletes over time is a valuable contribution. Such studies can provide insights into the long-term effects of specialized training and education, informing future policies and practices in sports science and exercise education. This forward-looking perspective is essential for ensuring the continued improvement of training and education programs.

Another significant contribution is the holistic approach taken in this study. By considering multiple facets of physical fitness within a single research framework, it recognizes the interrelated nature of these components. This holistic view challenges the reductionist approach that often focuses on only one aspect of fitness. It offers a more comprehensive understanding of physical fitness and its complexities.

The study also supports evidence-based decision-making in academic institutions and sports training facilities. Its findings can assist administrators, educators, and coaches in making informed choices about curriculum development, training protocols, and resource allocation. This practical aspect of the research ensures that it has a direct impact on real-world practices.

Lastly, the study promotes collaboration between Human Kinetics students and university athletes through recommendations such as peer mentorship programs and cross-training opportunities. These initiatives have the potential to foster a culture of knowledge exchange and skill development. Such collaboration not only benefits both groups but also holds the promise of generating innovative advancements in the fields of education and sports science.


  • ACSM. (2018). ACSM’s health-related physical fitness assessment manual. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  • Adedeji, A. (2019). Sports as an Industry in Nigeria: Nnamdi Azikiwe University Football Team as a Case Study. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 18(1), 42-48.
  • Alper, B. S., & Haynes, R. B. (2016). Reading clinical research: A user’s guide. McGraw Hill Professional.
  • Anderson, N., West, M. A., & Meier, D. (2020). The handbook of research on organizational justice and culture in higher education administration. IGI Global.
  • Baechle, T. R., & Earle, R. W. (2018). Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Human kinetics.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Bandura, A. (2015). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In Handbook of Moral Behavior and Development (pp. 349-400). Psychology Press.
  • Bartlett, J. D., & Drust, B. (2021). Developing a conceptual framework for sport science knowledge translation in professional football. Science and Medicine in Football, 5(1), 1-11.
  • Bauman, A. E., Reis, R. S., Sallis, J. F., Wells, J. C., Loos, R. J., Martin, B. W., & Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. (2012). Correlates of physical activity: Why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet, 380(9838), 258-271.
  • Beiske, B. (2017). Convenience sampling in exploratory research. In F. N. Saks & V. V. Villanueva (Eds.), Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students (pp. 53-68). Sage.
  • Bell, E., Bryman, A., & Harley, B. (2019). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.
  • Bishop, C. (2018). Training principles for power. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 40(1), 5-17.
  • Bjørkelund, L. A., Lidén, E., Brandheim, S., & Hysing, M. (2020). Health behaviour, sleep problems, and depressive symptoms in Norwegian adolescents: A longitudinal survey. PLoS ONE, 15(5), e0233142.
  • Bompa, T. O., & Haff, G. G. (2018). Periodization: Theory and methodology of training. Human Kinetics.
  • Brown, A. L., & Patel, R. V. (2018). Cross-cultural comparative study on physical fitness among high school students in the United States and India. Journal of Sport Science & Medicine, 17(3), 514-520.
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!