Language Use in Social Media: An Example of Twitter Slang
Chapter One
Objective of the study
The objective of this study is to examine language use in social media, focusing specifically on Twitter slang. The study aims to:
- Investigate the types and features of slang used on Twitter, including abbreviations, acronyms, hashtags, and hybrid expressions.
- Assess the role of Twitter slang in shaping digital communication, identity, and community among users.
- Examine the potential influence of Twitter slang on language skills, literacy, and formal communication.
- Explore the cultural and social implications of Twitter slang, particularly in the Nigerian context.
CHAPTER TWO
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Twitter is a globally recognized social media platform that allows users to share short, real-time messages known as “tweets.” Since its launch in 2006, Twitter has revolutionized digital communication by combining microblogging with social networking, enabling rapid information dissemination and interaction among individuals, organizations, and communities (Page, 2012; Kietzmann et al., 2011). Tweets were initially limited to 140 characters, a restriction that encouraged brevity and linguistic creativity. In 2017, this limit was increased to 280 characters, yet the platform retains its emphasis on concise communication (Kumar et al., 2020).
Twitter distinguishes itself from other social media platforms through features such as hashtags (#), mentions (@), retweets (RT), and trending topics. Hashtags allow users to categorize content and participate in broader conversations, while retweets facilitate the amplification of messages across networks. Mentions enable direct interaction between users, fostering engagement and social connectivity (Bruns & Burgess, 2015).
Functionally, Twitter serves multiple purposes: social interaction, news sharing, political engagement, professional networking, and digital marketing. Researchers note that the platform has become a key site for sociolinguistic study due to its distinct communication norms and language practices, including the widespread use of abbreviations, emojis, and internet slang (Zappavigna, 2017). These features make Twitter a unique space for observing language evolution, identity construction, and community formation in online environments (Tagg & Hu, 2017).
Moreover, Twitter’s design emphasizes immediacy, public accessibility, and interactivity. Unlike private messaging platforms, most tweets are publicly visible by default, creating opportunities for viral dissemination of content, social influence, and collective discourse (Murthy, 2018). This visibility contributes to its role in social movements, political campaigns, and activism, as seen in global initiatives such as #BlackLivesMatter and #MeToo (Jackson, Bailey & Welles, 2020).
In addition, Twitter allows multimodal communication, integrating text, images, videos, GIFs, and hyperlinks. This integration supports rich forms of expression that extend beyond written language, enabling users to convey complex emotions, humor, and cultural references succinctly. The platform’s constraints, such as character limits, have driven linguistic innovation, including the emergence of Twitter-specific slang, abbreviations, and creative forms of expression that are distinct from conventional language norms (Crystal, 2011).
CHAPTER THREE
METHODOLOGY
Advertisements
Research Design
This study adopted a descriptive research design to explore language use on social media, specifically focusing on Twitter slang. The descriptive approach was chosen because it allows the researcher to observe, describe, and analyze linguistic patterns, features, and functions of Twitter slang as they naturally occur on the platform (Best & Kahn, 2016). The study combined both qualitative and quantitative methods to provide a comprehensive understanding of how Twitter users employ slang and hybrid language for communication, identity expression, and social interaction.
Population of the Study
The population for this study comprised active Nigerian Twitter users who frequently use Twitter for social interaction, entertainment, news, and civic engagement. Nigeria was chosen due to its diverse linguistic environment, high social media engagement, and the prevalence of hybrid language forms (Ezeani & Ezeani, 2017). The population included users across age groups, professional backgrounds, and educational levels, though the study focused primarily on youths and young adults aged 16–35, who are the most active users of social media slang (Tagg & Hu, 2017).
CHAPTER FOUR
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
This chapter presents, analyzes, and interprets the data collected from the 200 Nigerian Twitter users and the 1,000 sampled tweets. The analysis is structured around the study’s research questions, focusing on the types and linguistic features of Twitter slang and its influence on communication, social identity, and community building online. Data from the questionnaires were analyzed using descriptive statistics (frequencies and percentages), while content analysis was applied to tweets to identify linguistic patterns and social functions.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
This study investigated the language use in social media, focusing specifically on Twitter slang among Nigerian users. Data were collected through content analysis of 1,000 tweets and questionnaires administered to 200 active Twitter users. The analysis addressed the types and linguistic features of Twitter slang and its influence on communication, social identity, and community building online. The study’s findings can be summarized as follows:
- Types and Linguistic Features of Twitter Slang:
- Twitter slang consists of abbreviations, acronyms, hashtags, emojis, and hybrid expressions.
- Acronyms were the most frequently used form (31%), followed by hashtags (25%) and abbreviations (22%).
- Hybrid expressions, blending English with local languages or Pidgin (e.g., “No wahala, LOL”), reflected cultural identity and creativity.
- Emojis were employed to convey tone, emotion, and context within messages.
- Influence of Twitter Slang on Communication and Social Interaction:
- A majority of respondents (90%) indicated that Twitter slang enhances rapid and effective communication, especially within the platform’s character constraints.
- Eighty percent (80%) acknowledged that slang expresses social and cultural identity, while 75% noted its role in strengthening community and online engagement.
- Slang encourages creativity in language use (85%) but may pose challenges to formal writing and professional communication for some users (50%).
- Cultural and Social Implications:
- Hybrid expressions and locally adapted slang reflect Nigerian cultural identity, while hashtags facilitate participation in collective discussions and social movements.
- Twitter slang fosters digital community formation, enabling users to connect, interact, and build a sense of belonging within online spaces.
Overall, the study demonstrates that Twitter slang functions as both a linguistic and social tool, integrating creativity, identity expression, and digital interaction.
Conclusion
Based on the findings, the study concludes that:
- Twitter slang is a dynamic and multimodal linguistic phenomenon that plays a significant role in shaping communication patterns among Nigerian social media users.
- The use of slang, hybrid expressions, and emojis enhances digital communication efficiency, facilitates social identity construction, and fosters community engagement online.
- While Twitter slang promotes creativity and cultural expression, it may also challenge formal communication skills, highlighting the need for balanced language practices that distinguish between informal digital discourse and formal writing contexts.
- Twitter slang exemplifies the interplay between global digital culture and local linguistic identity, reflecting broader social, cultural, and technological trends in contemporary Nigerian society.
Recommendations
Based on the findings and conclusions, the following recommendations are made:
- Integrate discussions on digital language, including Twitter slang, into literacy and language curricula to enhance students’ awareness of informal and formal registers.
- Encourage students to critically evaluate digital language use while maintaining proficiency in standard English for academic and professional communication.
- Use Twitter slang creatively and responsibly, recognizing its role in digital identity formation and community engagement while balancing formal language skills.
- Develop code-switching strategies to navigate between informal social media communication and formal writing contexts effectively.
- Conduct further studies on the long-term impact of social media slang on literacy, writing skills, and language evolution in Nigeria and other multilingual contexts.
- Explore the potential of leveraging Twitter and other social media platforms for digital literacy programs, civic engagement, and cultural preservation.
REFERENCES
- Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change. De Gruyter.
- Bamman, D., Eisenstein, J., & Schnoebelen, T. (2014). Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 135–160.
- Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. (2015). Twitter hashtags from ad hoc to calculated publics. In N. Rambukkana (Ed.), Hashtag Publics: The Power and Politics of Discursive Networks. Peter Lang.
- Ezeani, C., & Ezeani, E. (2017). Code-switching and hybrid language use in Nigerian social media discourse. Journal of African Cultural Studies, 29(3), 300–316.
- Murthy, D. (2018). Twitter: Social Communication in the Twitter Age. Polity Press.
- Tagg, C., & Hu, R. (2017). Beyond English: Exploring multilingual communication in Twitter. Discourse, Context & Media, 19, 1–10.
- Thurlow, C. (2018). Digital Discourse: Language in the New Media. Oxford University Press.
- Baron, N. S. (2008). Always On: Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford University Press.
- Crystal, D. (2011). Internet Linguistics: A Student Guide. Routledge.
- Herring, S. C., & Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Computer-mediated discourse 2.0. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis(2nd ed., pp. 127–151). Wiley-Blackwell.
- Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.
- Plester, B., Wood, C., & Bell, V. (2009). Txt msg n school literacy: Does texting and knowledge of text abbreviations adversely affect children’s literacy attainment? Reading and Writing, 22, 291–312.
