Maximizing the Value of Information Technology in the Library Environment
Objective of the study
- To identify and analyze the technical challenges libraries face in integrating information technology, including issues of compatibility
- To explore the human-centric challenges of implementing IT in libraries, including user engagement
- To evaluate the resource allocation practices in libraries, including financial constraints, sustainability concerns.
REVIEWED OF RELATED LITERATURE
A library management system is a significant investment for library. Hitherto, the literature of librarianship was full of articles on library administration. Library schools also had courses on library administration only. However, now things have changed, librarians have changed and decided to move with the times and so we now have management courses taught in library schools and management principle practiced in libraries.
Library job nomenclature hardly has the word “manager” attached to any post, at least not in our immediate environment, management positions do exist. The people who are placed in such positions invariably apply management principles and practice in their work. In the university library, Head of Administrations, Head of Sections, and even shift heads are not management positions. Evan (1976) said that the profit and loss statement does not exist for library; but the need for good managerial skills is just as critical in the library as it is in a profit making organization.
Librarians are veritable mediators between man and information resources that have been produced through generations. Thus the main objective of the librarian is to maximise the social utility of these records of human culture for the benefit of humanity. Libraries are living agencies of progress, cultural enrichment and public enlightment. They are embedded in the foundations of the cultural process and form part of the foundation of a civilized life (Aguolu and Aguolu 2002).
We live in an age of options. A host of competitors compete to satisfy our wants and whims. We may choose products and services based on familiarity, comfort, trust, and satisfaction. However, rapid innovation, sophisticated marketing, and advances in communication result in an increasing awareness of new options and a greater variety of choices. Thus we may abandon our traditional choices for new products and services based on curiosity, effective marketing, and evidence of a clearly superior option. The ability of businesses and organisations to promote their services or to make potential users aware of their products can mean the difference between success and extinction (Kotler, 1997).
Do the tribulations of market competition also apply to traditionally well-regarded non-profit institutions such as college or university libraries? Though long considered well insulated from the storms of entrepreneurial competition, the academic library profession is now finding alternative information providers eroding their user base (Coffman and McGlamery, 2000; Gibbons, 2001; Mercado, 1998). Information costs are wreaking havoc with the budgets of most university libraries (Bosch and Simons, 1996). On many campuses, competition for funds and the stewardship of information is threatening the heretofore-inviolate role of the library as an essential information provider within the academia. For the current generation of college students the university library is but one of many information providers (OCLC, 2002).
For the current generation of university and their various faculties, library is becoming an increasingly unfamiliar locale – providing ever more complex and complicated information tools while simultaneously reducing traditional formats of information such as the print journal (Hagner, 2000; Morton, 1997). For the current generation of university administrators, the library is another mouth to feed, perhaps to be subsumed under a campus IT unit (Renauld, 2001). Alternatively, the university administration may view the library as just a quaint repository for books and a provider of quiet study space whose role as a primary information provider has been superseded by the Internet (Hawkins, 2001, Stone, 2002).
Librarians and information specialists now argue that to ensure a prominent position within the future world of academia, library faculty must market their skills, services and resources (Brunsdale, 2000; Dodsworth, 1998; McCarthy, 1994; Rowley, 1995). Without effective ongoing public relations, academic libraries may appear less relevant and less necessary to future generations of students, faculty and administrators.
In this chapter, we described the research procedure for this study. A research methodology is a research process adopted or employed to systematically and scientifically present the results of a study to the research audience viz. a vis, the study beneficiaries.
Research designs are perceived to be an overall strategy adopted by the researcher whereby different components of the study are integrated in a logical manner to effectively address a research problem. In this study, the researcher employed the survey research design. This is due to the nature of the study whereby the opinion and views of people are sampled. According to Singleton & Straits, (2009), Survey research can use quantitative research strategies (e.g., using questionnaires with numerically rated items), qualitative research strategies (e.g., using open-ended questions), or both strategies (i.e., mixed methods). As it is often used to describe and explore human behaviour, surveys are therefore frequently used in social and psychological research.
POPULATION OF THE STUDY
According to Udoyen (2019), a study population is a group of elements or individuals as the case may be, who share similar characteristics. These similar features can include location, gender, age, sex or specific interest. The emphasis on study population is that it constitutes of individuals or elements that are homogeneous in description.
This study was carried to examine Maximizing the value of information technology in the library environment. Selected Libraries in Ibadan form the population of the study.
DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
This chapter presents the analysis of data derived through the questionnaire and key informant interview administered on the respondents in the study area. The analysis and interpretation were derived from the findings of the study. The data analysis depicts the simple frequency and percentage of the respondents as well as interpretation of the information gathered. A total of eighty (80) questionnaires were administered to respondents of which only seventy-seven (77) were returned and validated. This was due to irregular, incomplete and inappropriate responses to some questionnaire. For this study a total of 77 was validated for the analysis.
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
It is important to ascertain that the objective of this study was to ascertain Maximizing the value of information technology in the library environment. In the preceding chapter, the relevant data collected for this study were presented, critically analyzed and appropriate interpretation given. In this chapter, certain recommendations made which in the opinion of the researcher will be of benefits in addressing Maximizing the value of information technology in the library environment.
This study was on Maximizing the value of information technology in the library environment. Three objectives were raised which included: To identify and analyze the technical challenges libraries face in integrating information technology, including issues of compatibility, to explore the human-centric challenges of implementing IT in libraries, including user engagement and to evaluate the resource allocation practices in libraries, including financial constraints, sustainability concerns. A total of 77 responses were received and validated from the enrolled participants where all respondents were drawn from selected libraries in Ibadan. Hypothesis was tested using Chi-Square statistical tool (SPSS).
In a world shaped by rapid technological advancements, the integration of information technology (IT) in the library environment has emerged as a transformative force. This study delved into the complexities, challenges, and opportunities presented by this integration, shedding light on the multifaceted landscape that libraries navigate as they harness the power of technology to redefine their roles in the digital age.
The journey into this investigation unveiled a myriad of technical challenges, from compatibility issues to data security concerns. The digital preservation of resources and the imperative to ensure user data privacy emerged as critical considerations. Yet, amidst these challenges, libraries have the potential to leverage technology to bridge gaps, foster inclusivity, and amplify their impact on communities.
Human-centric factors came to the forefront as the study explored how user engagement, staff training, and the equilibrium between traditional and digital services play pivotal roles. The digital transformation offers opportunities to reimagine library spaces, augment learning experiences, and empower patrons with easily accessible knowledge resources.
The study recognized the importance of equitable access to technology-enabled services, striving to overcome the digital divide and ensure that the benefits of IT are extended to all members of society. Additionally, the exploration of resource allocation practices addressed the balance between sustainability and innovation, offering insights into strategic decision-making.
The study’s findings culminated in actionable recommendations for libraries, administrators, and stakeholders, serving as a compass to navigate the intricate waters of technology integration. These recommendations underscored the significance of user-centric approaches, holistic staff training, and a commitment to fostering inclusivity.
As we reflect upon this study’s journey, it is clear that the integration of IT in the library environment is not merely a technological shift—it is a paradigmatic evolution. Libraries have the potential to be more than repositories; they can become dynamic hubs of knowledge dissemination, collaborative learning, and community engagement. By maximizing the value of information technology, libraries can enrich their patrons’ lives, fuel lifelong learning, and remain steadfast guardians of information in an ever-evolving digital landscape.
The conclusion of this study marks not an endpoint, but a call to action. The journey continues as libraries, practitioners, and stakeholders embark on the mission to actualize the transformative potential of information technology, creating a future where libraries thrive as beacons of knowledge, innovation, and connection in the global tapestry of learning and discovery
Develop and implement comprehensive digital literacy programs for library patrons of all ages. These programs should cover not only basic digital skills but also encompass advanced information retrieval techniques, critical thinking in digital spaces, and ethical use of technology.
Prioritize user-centered design when implementing technology-enabled services. Conduct regular user surveys, focus groups, and usability testing to ensure that digital interfaces and services are intuitive, accessible, and tailored to patrons’ needs.
Invest in ongoing staff training programs that encompass the latest trends, tools, and technologies in library science and information technology. Equipped staff can confidently assist patrons, troubleshoot technical issues, and curate relevant digital resources.
Initiate initiatives to bridge the digital divide, ensuring that technology-enabled services are accessible to all patrons. Offer training programs targeting marginalized communities, deploy mobile technology units to underserved areas, and collaborate with local organizations to reach diverse demographics.
Strive for a harmonious integration of digital and traditional library services. Maintain physical collections while augmenting them with digital resources. Offer hybrid events that blend in-person and virtual participation to cater to different preferences.
Redesign library spaces to accommodate collaborative learning, featuring technology-rich zones for group discussions, workshops, and multimedia creation. These spaces should encourage creativity, interaction, and knowledge sharing.
Implement stringent data security protocols to safeguard patron information and privacy. Regularly update security software, conduct risk assessments, and ensure compliance with data protection regulations.
- Applegate, L. (1994), “Managing in an Information Age: Transforming the Organisation for the 1990s“, in Baskerville, R., Smithson, S., Ngwenyama, O, DeGross, J. I, Transforming Organisations with Information Technology, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 15-94.
- Barnes, J. G. (1993), “New Technologies, New Markets, and Changing Marketing Practice”, Irish, Marketing Review, Vol. 6, pp. 45-52.
- Brownlie, D. and Saren, M. (1997), “The New Marketing Myopia: Critical Perspectives on Theory and Research in Marketing – Introduction“, European Journal of Marketing, 28, 3, pp. 6-12.
- Brunsdale, M. (2000), “From Mild to Wild: Strategies for Promoting Academic Libraries to Undergraduates“, Reference and User Services Quarterly, Vol. 39, 4, pp. 331-335.
- Burnstein, D. and Kline, D. (1995), Road Warriors: Dreams and Nightmares along the Information Highway, Dutton Books, New York, NY.
- Earl, M. J. (1989), “Management Strategies for Information Technology, Business Information Technology Series”, Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.