Sub-Regional Organisation and Global Stability: A Study of Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS)
Chapter One
Objectives of the Study
The study aims to achieve the following objectives:
- To analyze ECOWAS’s institutional mechanisms for conflict prevention, management, and resolution.
- To evaluate the successes and failures of ECOWAS’s peacekeeping and diplomatic interventions in West Africa.
- To identify the internal and external challenges that impede ECOWAS’s ability to ensure regional stability.
- To assess the implications of ECOWAS’s stability efforts for global peace and security.
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Preamble
The literature review serves as a foundational component of this study, providing a comprehensive exploration of existing knowledge relevant to ECOWAS’s role in regional peace and security. It seeks to establish a solid academic grounding by clarifying key concepts, examining theoretical frameworks, and analyzing empirical findings from related studies. This chapter enables a deeper understanding of the institutional, political, and operational dynamics that influence ECOWAS’s conflict management strategies. By identifying gaps and contradictions in previous research, the review justifies the present study’s relevance and objectives, ensuring that its contributions are both original and significant within the broader field of international relations.
Conceptual Clarifications
Concept of Conflict and Conflict Management
Conflict is an inevitable aspect of human interaction that arises from perceived incompatibilities in goals, interests, or values between individuals, groups, or states. In the context of international relations, conflict is often characterized by political, economic, and social confrontations that may escalate into violence if left unmanaged. Conflict can be intra-state, inter-state, or transnational, and may manifest in forms such as civil wars, political unrest, ethnic clashes, or coups d’état (Odobo et al., 2023).
Conflicts are generally classified into various typologies based on their nature and the actors involved. These include political conflicts, resource-based conflicts, identity or ethnic conflicts, and ideological conflicts. Political conflicts typically revolve around governance, legitimacy, or power struggles, often leading to coups or civil wars as witnessed in countries like Mali and Guinea (Ronceray, 2023). Resource-based conflicts emerge over the control and allocation of natural or economic resources, which can become severe in fragile economies where state capacity is limited (Onyekwere, 2020). Ethnic and identity-based conflicts are prevalent in multi-ethnic societies and are often fueled by historical grievances or marginalization (Amao, 2019).
CHAPTER THREE
INSTITUTIONAL DYNAMICS AND OPERATIONAL CAPACITY OF ECOWAS IN REGIONAL PEACEBUILDING
Preamble
This section introduces the structure and function of ECOWAS institutions that are central to maintaining peace and security within the West African region. ECOWAS operates through various bodies, including the ECOWAS Commission, the Mediation and Security Council, and the ECOWAS Standby Force, each playing distinct roles in conflict prevention, resolution, and peacebuilding. Understanding these institutions is essential for analyzing how ECOWAS designs and implements its peace interventions. This overview sets the foundation for examining the effectiveness and challenges of ECOWAS’s peace and security mechanisms in subsequent sections of the study.
Advertisements
Legal and Institutional Framework for Peace and Security
The legal and institutional framework underpinning ECOWAS’s peace and security architecture is fundamental to the organization’s efforts in promoting regional stability and conflict resolution across West Africa. ECOWAS has developed a robust set of protocols, charters, and mechanisms that collectively guide its peace interventions and diplomatic engagements. Among the most significant legal instruments is the 1999 Protocol Relating to the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping and Security (commonly referred to as the ECOWAS Mechanism).
CHAPTER FOUR
EVALUATING ECOWAS PEACE AND SECURITY OUTCOMES IN WEST AFRICA
Preamble
This chapter serves as the preamble to the analysis chapter, providing an overview of the analytical approach adopted in this study. It outlines how the data collected will be systematically examined to address the research objectives, focusing on evaluating ECOWAS’s effectiveness in peace and security management. The section emphasizes the alignment between the analysis techniques—such as descriptive and inferential statistics—and the study’s aims to assess institutional challenges, operational strategies, and outcomes of ECOWAS interventions. This ensures that the findings directly contribute to understanding and improving regional conflict management mechanisms.
CHAPTER FIVE
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of Findings
This study investigated the role of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) in conflict prevention, management, and resolution across the West African subregion. The research analyzed various components of ECOWAS interventions, including its legal and institutional frameworks, peacekeeping missions, diplomatic engagements, and challenges undermining its operational effectiveness. In doing so, it assessed how ECOWAS mechanisms have evolved, their success and failure rates, and the broader implications for international peace and security. This section summarizes the main findings from the research.
One of the key findings is that ECOWAS has developed a robust legal and institutional framework for addressing conflicts in West Africa. Over time, the organization has expanded beyond its original mandate of economic integration to include peace and security as a central pillar. Through protocols such as the Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Management, Resolution, Peacekeeping, and Security, ECOWAS has institutionalized early warning systems, mediation organs, and peacekeeping structures. These frameworks have been vital in identifying early signs of conflict, deploying mediation teams, and sending peacekeeping forces when necessary. The ECOWAS Early Warning and Response Network (ECOWARN) has been instrumental in monitoring tensions and providing data for preventive diplomacy.
The study also found that ECOWAS has been proactive in intervening in conflicts that threaten peace and stability in the subregion. From Liberia and Sierra Leone to Côte d’Ivoire and The Gambia, ECOWAS has taken steps to restore order, support democratic processes, and prevent full-scale civil wars. Peacekeeping missions, especially those conducted under the ECOMOG (ECOWAS Monitoring Group) umbrella, have often filled a vacuum left by the delayed responses of international actors. While some of these missions faced criticism for a lack of coordination, logistical setbacks, and questions about mandate legitimacy, they generally helped stabilize volatile political situations and opened space for peacebuilding processes to begin.
Diplomatic interventions were found to be a core strategy employed by ECOWAS in managing political crises. Through high-level mediation and shuttle diplomacy, the organization has helped to negotiate peace agreements, organize democratic elections, and oversee political transitions. The diplomatic engagement in The Gambia in 2016, which led to a peaceful transition of power, serves as a landmark example of how regional pressure combined with diplomacy can avert violent confrontations. These interventions, though not always flawless, have demonstrated the organization’s potential as a credible mediator in the region.
Another important finding is that despite its efforts, ECOWAS faces persistent challenges that undermine its ability to effectively manage conflicts. Institutional weaknesses such as bureaucratic inefficiency, weak enforcement mechanisms, and dependency on external support were identified as critical impediments. Financial constraints remain a major challenge, limiting ECOWAS’s ability to plan and execute missions independently. Most of the peacekeeping operations and conflict response activities rely on foreign donor funding, which often comes with delays or conditionalities that reduce operational flexibility.
Political interference and lack of unity among member states were also found to affect ECOWAS’s performance. The principle of non-interference in domestic affairs, although officially discarded in the context of gross human rights violations, still influences the political will of member states to act decisively. In some instances, member states have undermined collective decisions due to national interests, reducing the effectiveness of the organization’s responses. This has led to perceptions of inconsistency and selective intervention, weakening ECOWAS’s credibility.
Furthermore, logistical limitations, including lack of adequate military hardware, poor communication infrastructure, and limited capacity for rapid deployment, continue to hinder ECOWAS’s peacekeeping missions. While the regional standby force exists in theory, its activation in practice has been slow and cumbersome, raising questions about readiness and sustainability. The absence of a permanent military logistics hub and coordination challenges with external partners like the African Union and the United Nations have also contributed to operational delays.
The research also identified that the relationship between ECOWAS and international actors is both cooperative and occasionally conflicted. In many situations, ECOWAS has worked alongside the African Union, the United Nations, and international donor agencies to manage crises. However, differences in strategies, overlapping mandates, and coordination gaps have sometimes complicated joint responses. While ECOWAS is often praised for acting swiftly compared to global bodies, these actions sometimes lead to diplomatic tensions or duplications of efforts.
Moreover, the study highlighted that ECOWAS’s involvement in counterterrorism and transnational crime is growing, especially with the rise of violent extremist groups in the Sahel region. The regional action plans to combat terrorism and organized crime mark a shift toward broader security objectives. However, implementation remains slow due to financial, technical, and political challenges. The regional body has recognized the link between security and development, but effective integration of both strategies is still lacking.
In terms of outcomes, ECOWAS interventions have produced mixed results. While some missions such as those in The Gambia and Liberia are regarded as successful, others such as those in Guinea-Bissau and Mali have had limited or short-lived impacts. Success has largely depended on the clarity of mandates, the commitment of member states, availability of resources, and cooperation from national actors. The lack of sustained post-conflict engagement has also led to relapse into instability in some countries.
Finally, the study found that ECOWAS plays a vital role in maintaining regional peace and contributes to international peace and security. It acts as an early responder to regional crises, thereby reducing the burden on the international community. At the same time, its limitations and operational challenges mean that it cannot act as a substitute for broader global peace mechanisms. For ECOWAS to enhance its impact, reforms are needed to strengthen its institutional capacity, ensure financial independence, and promote political cohesion among member states.
Conclusion
This study concludes that ECOWAS has played a significant yet mixed role in the prevention, management, and resolution of conflicts within West Africa. Its proactive stance, particularly through mechanisms like ECOWARN and interventions such as ECOMOG missions and diplomatic mediations, has contributed to stabilizing conflict-prone areas and promoting democratic governance. However, the effectiveness of these efforts is often limited by institutional weaknesses, financial dependence on external donors, logistical challenges, and inconsistent political will among member states. The organization’s peacekeeping operations, while sometimes successful, have struggled with sustainability, coordination, and post-conflict follow-up. Furthermore, ECOWAS’s growing involvement in counterterrorism reflects its adaptability to emerging security threats, but resource constraints continue to hinder comprehensive responses. Despite these challenges, ECOWAS remains a crucial regional actor in maintaining peace and security and serves as a vital partner to global institutions. Strengthening its internal capacity, ensuring member-state commitment, and securing sustainable funding are essential for enhancing its operational effectiveness. Ultimately, ECOWAS’s continued relevance in both regional and international peace architecture will depend on its ability to evolve and address internal shortcomings while fostering stronger collaboration with external partners and stakeholders.
Recommendations
The following recommendations were proposed based on the findings of this study:
- Strengthen Institutional Capacity: ECOWAS should invest in strengthening the technical and operational capacity of its conflict prevention and peacekeeping organs. This includes improving early warning systems, enhancing rapid response capabilities, and training personnel in conflict resolution and post-conflict recovery.
- Ensure Consistent Political Will Among Member States: Member states must demonstrate unified and sustained political commitment to the organization’s peace and security mandates. This entails honoring intervention protocols, avoiding selective support for missions, and upholding democratic principles.
- Improve Financial Independence and Resource Mobilization: ECOWAS must reduce overdependence on foreign donors by developing a robust and transparent internal funding mechanism. This can be achieved through fair and timely member contributions, the creation of regional peace funds, and partnerships with private sector actors.
- Enhance Coordination with International Partners: To improve synergy and avoid duplication of efforts, ECOWAS should strengthen its collaboration with international bodies such as the African Union, United Nations, and the European Union. Joint training, intelligence sharing, and strategic alignment of missions are essential.
- Promote Post-Conflict Peacebuilding and Development: Peacekeeping efforts should be accompanied by comprehensive peacebuilding programs that focus on governance reforms, reconciliation, and socio-economic development. This will ensure lasting peace and prevent the resurgence of conflicts.
Limitations of the Study
This study faced several limitations that may have affected the depth and generalizability of its findings. Firstly, the reliance on secondary data and case studies limited the ability to capture real-time developments and firsthand perspectives from key ECOWAS stakeholders. Additionally, political sensitivity surrounding some of the conflicts examined posed challenges in accessing comprehensive and unbiased information. The scope of the study was also geographically confined to West Africa, potentially overlooking broader continental or global dynamics that influence ECOWAS operations. Finally, time and resource constraints restricted the inclusion of a more extensive range of conflict scenarios for a more robust comparative analysis.
 Suggestions for Further Studies
Future research could benefit from a more extensive empirical investigation involving primary data collection through interviews and fieldwork with ECOWAS officials, peacekeepers, and affected communities to gain deeper insights into the practical challenges and successes of ECOWAS interventions. Comparative studies examining ECOWAS alongside other regional organizations’ conflict management frameworks, such as the African Union or SADC, would help identify best practices and areas for improvement. Additionally, exploring the long-term impacts of ECOWAS peacekeeping missions on post-conflict recovery and state-building could provide valuable perspectives on sustainability. Finally, studies focused on the evolving role of external actors and the implications of global geopolitical shifts on ECOWAS’s peace and security agenda would be timely and relevant.
 References
- Adu, Y. N., & Mezyaev, A. B. (2023). The conflict between ECOWAS and Mali: International legal and political aspects. International Organisations Research Journal, 18(2), 170–189.
- Afesorgbor, S. K., & Van Bergeijk, P. (2021). Multi-membership and the effectiveness of regional trade agreements in Western and Southern Africa: A comparative study of ECOWAS and SADC. Institute of Social Sciences Working Paper No. 520. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1766522
- Aning, E. K. (2022). Investing in peace and security in Africa: The case of ECOWAS. Conflict, Security & Development, 4(3), 533–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/1467880042000320050
- Bamfo, N. A. (2023). The political and security challenges facing ECOWAS in the twenty-first century: Testing the limits of an organization’s reputation. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(3), 12–23. https://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_3_February_2013/2.pdf
- Bolaji, K. A. (2022). Adapting traditional peacemaking principles to contemporary conflicts: The ECOWAS conflict prevention framework. African Conflict & Peacebuilding Review, 1(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.2979/AFRICONFPEACREVI.1.2.183
- Bristow, G., & Healy, A. (2024). Building resilient regions: Complex adaptive systems and the role of policy intervention. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 72(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-014-0280-0
