The Impact of Infectious Epidemic on the Financial Sector a Case Study of Coronavirus Disease
Objective of the study
The objectives of the study are;
- To examine the level of coronavirus disease in Nigeria.
- To investigate the impact of coronavirus disease on financial transactions in Nigeria.
- To ascertain the relationship between infectious epidemic (COVID19) and financial sector.
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus.
Most people infected with the COVID-19 virus will experience mild to moderate respiratory illness and recover without requiring special treatment. Older people, and those with underlying medical problems like cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory disease, and cancer are more likely to develop serious illness.
The best way to prevent and slow down transmission is be well informed about the COVID-19 virus, the disease it causes and how it spreads. Protect yourself and others from infection by washing your hands or using an alcohol based rub frequently and not touching your face.
The COVID-19 virus spreads primarily through droplets of saliva or discharge from the nose when an infected person coughs or sneezes, so it’s important that you also practice respiratory etiquette (for example, by coughing into a flexed elbow).
At this time, there are no specific vaccines or treatments for COVID-19. However, there are many ongoing clinical trials evaluating potential treatments. WHO will continue to provide updated information as soon as clinical findings become available
Preventing the pandemic of COVID-19
With the conceptualization on building a community with a shared future for mankind proposed by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013, Chinese people have taken following actions to prevent the pandemic of the diseases: (i) sharing the sequences of SARS-Cov-2 virus with the World Health Organization (WHO) and other countries which are important information for other countries to prepare the tests for screening and diagnosis, (ii) all epidemiological data with clinical treatment in China has been published in the international journals, (iii) prevent spreading of the disease by traveling ban in Wuhan, (iv) medical quarantine has been performed for all suspected contactors, (v) body temperature measuring facilities were equipped in all railway stations and airports, etc. In order to take very strict contain measures for COVID-19 outbreak tailored to local settings, the travelling ban was executed in Wuhan, and encouraging no gathering and less travelling in other cities out of Hubei Province. Those actions were implemented by strong coordinating of the Chinese government in cooperation with local residents. To date, the epidemiological data has showed more than thousands of people have been protected from the infections, and increasing pattern of the transmission has been suppressed significantly in China.
The researcher used descriptive research survey design in building up this project work the choice of this research design was considered appropriate because of its advantages of identifying attributes of a large population from a group of individuals. The design was suitable for the study as the study sought the impact of infectious epidemic on financial sector. A case study of coronavirus disease.
Sources of data collection
Data were collected from two main sources namely:
(i)Primary source and
These are materials of statistical investigation which were collected by the research for a particular purpose. They can be obtained through a survey, observation questionnaire or as experiment; the researcher has adopted the questionnaire method for this study.
These are data from textbook Journal handset etc. they arise as byproducts of the same other purposes. Example administration, various other unpublished works and write ups were also used.
Population of the study
Population of a study is a group of persons or aggregate items, things the researcher is interested in getting information the impact of infectious epidemic on financial sector. A case study of coronavirus disease. 200 CBN selected staffs in Abuja was selected randomly by the researcher as the population of the study.
PRESENTATION ANALYSIS INTERPRETATION OF DATA
Efforts will be made at this stage to present, analyze and interpret the data collected during the field survey. This presentation will be based on the responses from the completed questionnaires. The result of this exercise will be summarized in tabular forms for easy references and analysis. It will also show answers to questions relating to the research questions for this research study. The researcher employed simple percentage in the analysis.
SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
It is important to ascertain that the objective of this study was to ascertain the impact of infectious epidemic on financial sector. A case study of coronavirus disease. In the preceding chapter, the relevant data collected for this study were presented, critically analyzed and appropriate interpretation given. In this chapter, certain recommendations made which in the opinion of the researcher will be of benefits in addressing the challenges of infectious epidemic on financial sector.
This study was on the impact of infectious epidemic on financial sector. A case study of coronavirus disease. Three objectives were raised which included: To examine the level of coronavirus disease in Nigeria, to investigate the impact of coronavirus disease on financial transactions in Nigeria and to ascertain the relationship between infectious epidemic (COVID19) and financial sector. In line with these objectives, two research hypotheses were formulated and two null hypotheses were posited. The total population for the study is 200 staffs of CBN in Abuja. The researcher used questionnaires as the instrument for the data collection. Descriptive Survey research design was adopted for this study. A total of 133 respondents made administrative staffs, economists, senior staffs and junior staffs were used for the study. The data collected were presented in tables and analyzed using simple percentages and frequencies
We analyzed the coronavirus outbreak and the spillover to the global economy which triggered the global recession in 2020. Policy makers in many countries were under pressure to respond to the coronavirus outbreak. As a result, many governments made fast policy decisions that had far-reaching positive and negative effects on their respective economy – many countries plunged into a recession. Social distancing policies and lockdown restrictions were imposed in many countries, and there have been arguments that such social policies can trigger a recession. Lawmakers in many countries supported an extended social distancing policy, damning the consequences of social distancing on the economy. The recession that followed, which many countries experienced, was a reflection of the difficult choice that policy makers had to make in choosing whether to save the economy before saving the people or to save the people before saving the economy; many countries chose the latter. There were criticisms that the policies were too fast, premature or insufficient, and that the policies contradicted one another in some areas, for instance, the accommodative monetary policy encouraged economic agents to engage in economic activities while the lockdowns and social-distancing (stay-at-home) policy prevented economic activities from taking place. On the bright side, the coronavirus-induced public health crisis created an opportunity for many governments to make lasting reforms in the public health sector. Countries like the UK and Spain repaired their public health care system, and fixed other shortcomings in public infrastructure such as the transition to online education, transportation systems and the disease detection systems in public hospitals. Some governments also used the crisis as an opportunity to fix the economic system and the financial system with the planned federal stimulus package.
Fighting against COVID-19 spreading, including sharing the information of the disease transmission and epidemiological knowledge, sharing the experiences on case management and treatment approaches both for severe cases or light symptoms, and sharing new technologies or strategies to contain the transmission
- United Nations Development Group – Western and Central Africa . 2015. Socio-Economic Impact of Ebola Virus Disease in West African Countries World Bank 2014–2015 West Africa Ebola Crisis: Impact Update. 2016. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/macroeconomics/publication/2014-2015-west-africa-ebola-crisis-impact-update
- Lloyd’s Emerging Risks Team Pandemic – Potential Insurance Impacts. 2008. https://www.lloyds.com/~/media/lloyds/risk/er_pandemic_insuranceimpacts_v2.pdf accessed 18 June 2018.
- World Bank . International Working Group on Financing Preparedness; 2017. From Panic and Neglect to Investing in Health Security: Financing Pandemic Preparedness at a National Level.http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/979591495652724770/pdf/115271-REVISED-FINAL-IWG-Report-3-5-18.pdf accessed 18 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
- WHO WHO and World Bank Group Join Forces to Strengthen Global Health Security. Geneva. 2018. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/24-05-2018-who-and-world-bank-group-join-forces-to-strengthen-global-health-security
- Sanders G.D., Neumann P.J., Basu A., Brock D.W., Feeny D., Krahn M. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 2016;316:1093–1103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- . World Health Organization WHO Guide to Identifying the Economic Consequences of Disease and Injury. 2009. http://www.who.int/choice/publications/d_economic_impact_guide.pdf
- Rose A.Z. A framework for analyzing and estimating the total economic impacts of a terrorist attack and national disaster. J. Homel. Secur. Emerg. Manag. 2009;6(2009):4. [Google Scholar]
- McInerney J. Old economics for new problems – livestock disease: presidential address. J. Agric. Econ. 1996;47(3):295–314. [Google Scholar]