Advertisements

Business Administration Project Topics

The Impact of Organisational Structure of Commercial Bank on Efficient Customer Service

The Impact of Organisational Structure of Commercial Bank on Efficient Customer Service

Advertisements

The Impact of Organisational Structure of Commercial Bank on Efficient Customer Service

Chapter One

Objectivesย of theย Study

This research were grouped into two objectives which are general objectives and specificย objectives

Generalย Objective

This research seeks to examine the Organizational structures of Access Bank, Uyo and how it impacts workers performance.

Specificย Objectives

  1. To assess the structures and systems of Access Bank of Uyo
  2. To assess the influence of structures and systems on Customer Service in the Organization
  3. To assess the effect of structures and systems on service quality of Access Bank, Uyo.
  4. To identify the human resource systems effect on service quality of the Organization
  5. To analyse Customer Service on the quality of service at Access Bank

CHAPTERย TWO

LITERATUREย REVIEW

ย Theย Conceptย ofย Organizationalย Structure

Prominent authors of Management have talked about Organizational structure and variedย ways. Taylor’s (1911) talked about Organizational structure in prescriptions for scientificย management,ย Gulickย andย Urwick’sย (1937)ย viewedย Organizationalย structureย throughย theย discussionย ofย specialization,ย unityย ofย command,ย spanย ofย control,ย andย theย like,ย andย Weber(1946), idealโ€“typical model of bureaucracy. In the knowledge economy, an effectiveย structureย hasย toย provideย aย meansย ofย producingย knowledgeย forย theย Organizationย andย transforming knowledgeย into Organizational performance (Bierly,ย Kesslerย & Christensen,ย 2000)

The section would look at the history, definitions types, merits and demerits of the types ofย structure.

Historyย ofย Organizationalย Structure

Taylor et al : cited inย Mohr (n.d) the early theorists of Organizational structure realisedย structure is important for efficiency and effectiveness. They assumed Organizational membersย would function accordingly irrespective of the type of structure they have. Before the 1930s,ย when rebellion began, organizational structure was considered a matter of choice. When theย rebellion started, it got to be known as human relations theory, and there was still no denialย that structure was seen as an artefact rather an advocacy of the creation of a different sort ofย structure, one in which the required, knowledge, and views of employees might be givenย greaterย recognition.

In 1960s however, a different view came up, recommending that the organizational structureย is “an externally caused phenomenon, an outcome rather than an artefact.” Organizationalย theorists Lim et al (2010), in the 21st century, are once again suggestingย that organizationalย structureย developmentย isย veryย muchย dependentย onย theย expressionย ofย theย strategiesย andย behaviour ofย the management and theย workersย as constrained by theย power distributionย betweenย them,ย and influenced byย theirย environment and theย outcome.

Advertisements

Definitionsย forย Organizationalย Structure

Various definitions have been given for Organizational structure and a few are outlined here.ย Robbins & Coulter, (2009, p.201) defines Organizational structure as the formal arrangementย of jobs within an Organization. The above definition implies that an Organization in order toย prevent chaos in duty and also to ensure that employees work together mostly in their area ofย specialization to achieve its goals lay down a hierarchical structure to formalise employeesย duty.

Jacobide (2007) sees an Organizational structure as the viewing glass or perspective throughย which individuals see their organization and its environment. This definition implies that anย individual in an Organization perception or view about their Organization and its environmentย is based on the its structure. They determine what is expected from them looking at theย structure.

Jones and George(2005) have defined Organization structure as the formal system of task andย reportingย relationshipsย thatย controls,ย coordinatesย andย motivatesย employeesย soย thatย theyย cooperate and work together to achieve an Organizationโ€™s goals.ย Organizational structure isย theย wayย inย whichย organizationโ€™sย activitiesย areย divided,ย organizedย andย coordinated.ย Theย definitionsย given by Jonesย and George (2005)ย connotes the accepted limitย an individual canย go with Organizational duties and how motivated they get with respect to the Organizationalย structure. Interdependence of various sections and or departments within an Organization,ย accordingย to theseย threeย alsoย reflects in the Organization’sย structure.

From the above, a hierarchical structure representing how an Organization seeks to achieve itsย goals through its employees which reflects control and coordination of activities within theย Organization is an Organizational structure. This means an Organizational structure is veryย important especially where varied activities need to be undertaken to yield a final results. Anย Organizationย withย aย goodย structureย as seenย asย veryย efficientย andย effectiveย inย itsย operation.

 

CHAPTERย THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

ย Researchย Design

Research design according to Sheppard and Greene (2003),ย is the โ€œoverall plan for collectingย dataย inย orderย toย answerย theย researcherโ€™sย questionsย andย alsoย theย specificย dataย analysesย techniques and methods that the researcher intends to use”. Case study was adopted by theย researcher as the research design method for this research. This approach is used whenย questions being asked about current set ofย eventsย of which a researcher has minute or noneย controlย overย isย eitherย ‘how’ย orย ‘why’ย (Yin,ย 1994).ย Theyย canย beย usedย forย exploratory,ย descriptive,ย or explanatoryย purposes (Yin, 1993)

Populationย andย Sampleย Size

Populationย isย theย totalย collectionย ofย elementsย aboutย whichย oneย wishesย toย makeย someย inferences, Cooper and Schindler (2000). A research population is generally a large collectionย ofย individualsย orย objectsย thatย isย theย mainย focusย ofย aย scientificย query.ย Theย populationย forย this study was the customers and staff of the Access Bank.

CHAPTERย FOUR

ANALYSISย ANDย DISCUSSIONย OFย RESULTS

ย Demographicย Informationย ofย Staff

Demographicย dataย ofย theย respondentsย withย respectย toย theย staffย includedย gender,ย age,ย education, employment contract, years of work with the Organization, job title/position, andย theย departmentย ofย respondents.ย Itย isย importantย toย assessย theย staffย withย respectย toย theirย educational background,ย years of work, department, average hours ofย work per day andย employmentย contractย inย orderย toย ascertainย theย validityย ofย informationย providedย forย thisย researchย work.ย This helpsย inย ensuringย thatย dataย is gatheredย fromย theย appropriateย respondents.

Fromย tableย 4.1ย below,ย itย hasย beenย demonstratedย thatย genderย standsย theย percentageย ofย approximately 48 and 52 for male and female respectively.ย Greater percentage of staff is inย theย firstย degreeย levelย withย aย percentageย ofย 53,ย followedย byย HNDย holdersย withย percentageย of 34. About 7 percent holds masterโ€™s degree and few percent holding below HND. As per theย findings, a greater percentage of the staff have tertiary education hence are likely to react toย job satisfaction unlike their colleagues with high school education, consequently affectingย service delivery and quality. This also has the tendency to affect the cognisance given to theย Organizational structure most especially in situations where subordinates hold higher levels ofย educationย than superiorsย and muchย knowledgeableย and skilful thanย them.

CHAPTERย FIVE

SUMMARYย OFย FINDINGS,ย CONCLUSIONย ANDย RECOMMENDATIONS

Summaryย ofย Findings

For the purpose of assessing the impact of Organizational structures on Customer Service,ย thisย researchย wasย conducted.ย Theย generalย objectiveย ofย thisย researchย wasย toย examineย theย Organizational structuresย ofย Access Bank, Uyo and how it impacts Customer Service. On the other hand, the specific objectives were to assess the structures and systems of Access bank Uyo, to assess the influence of Access bank Uyo structures and systems on the nature of Customer Service in the Organization, to assess the influence of Access bank Uyo structures and systems onย service quality, to access the influence of the human resource systems on service quality andย toย analyseย the influenceย ofย Customer Serviceย on the qualityย of serviceย qualityย at Access bank Uyo

ย Organizational structures

George and Jones (2005) have defined Organization structure as the formal system of task andย reportingย relationshipsย thatย controls,ย coordinatesย andย motivatesย employeesย soย thatย theyย cooperateย andย workย togetherย toย achieveย anย Organizationโ€™sย goals.ย Robbinsย andย Coulterย (2009) defineย systemย asย aย setย ofย interrelatedย andย interdependentย partsย arrangedย inย mannerย thatย produces a unified whole. Organizations are composed of systems that come together to makeย themย functionย effectivelyย andย efficientlyย andย theseย systemsย areย theย HRย Systemsย andย Measurement Systems. The response gathered from the data collected indicated that staff of Access bank Uyoย giveย higherย recognitionย toย theirย Systemsย thanย itsย structureย asย theย meanย scoreย ofย Organizationalย systemsย areย 20.08ย andย 53.06ย respectively.ย Theย meanย scoreย ofย structuresย is

20.08.ย Itย canย beย deducedย fromย theย respondentsย thatย structuresย andย systemsย areย highlyย recognisedย in Access bank Uyo.

The influence of the Access Bank structures s onย theย natureย ofย Customer Serviceย inย theย Organization

From the findings, structure and Organizational systems are two independent variables used toย predict Customer Service. It has been observed that, there is significant relationship betweenย structure and Customer Service with the coefficient of correlation 0.585 showing strong positiveย correlation. This is in support of Ryall and Craig (2003) believes that organizational structureย exercisesย withinย anย organizationalย culture,ย butย itย isย interrelatedย andย Mastersย andย Shorkaย (2023) who found that organizational structure and organizational culture have a dependentย relationshipย withย oneย another.ย Theย significantย valueย isย 0.000ย andย isย lessย thanย theย benchmark

0.05.ย It can be deduced that a greater percentage of the respondents agreed that the structuresย andย systems haveย greater impactย on theย Customer Serviceย of Access bank Uyo.

ย The influence of the Access Bank structures and systems onย serviceย quality

A clearly defined customer-based business model that offers a reliable and readily accessibleย systemย isย theย definitionย givenย forย serviceย delivery.ย Althoughย Ladhariย (2009)ย recommended thatย SERVQUALย modelย isย goodย whenย usedย inย measuringย serviceย qualityย whichย hasย dimensions like tangibles, empathy and assurance of services, the findings indicate that thereย isย weakย negativeย correlationย betweenย structureย andย serviceย quality.ย Theย coefficientย ofย correlationย betweenย theย twoย variablesย isย -0.197,ย showingย weakย relationship.ย However,ย Organizational system and service quality shows slightly significant relationship, where theย sig.ย value is 0.049ย whichย is closedย to the benchmark (levelย of significanceย 0.05).

Conclusion

It could be concluded from this study, that the quality of service rendered to customers ofย Access Bankย cannotย beย attributed toย the structures, systemsย and theย Customer Serviceย theย Organizationย haveย dueย toย theย relationย generatedย inย theย correlationย andย regression analysis. The quality of empathy and responsiveness are directly linked to staffย contributionย toย serviceย qualityย butย theย studyย provedย thatย aย majorityย ofย Access Bank staff attest to the fact that it has better systems in place. Human Resourceย systemsย areย seen toย be theย motivatingย factor for employeesย at theย work place.

Also, a change in structures does not necessarily guarantee any significant change in serviceย delivery with regards to tangibility and accessibility. However, structures and systems haveย significant influence on the work conclude from the result generated but not on serviceย delivery.

Recommendations

With the findings of the study as the basis, the recommendations made to fill the academicย gapsย are as follows;

High cognisance to Organizational structures become hindrance to delivery ofย quality service hence the need to introduce negotiated order in Access Bankย so asย to allowย other departmentsย aid inย attendingย toย customers whenย the needย arises

Also, Access Bank use of the hierarchical structures also adopt the useย of the hierarchical culture also known as control culture which is highly formal therebyย preventingย departmentsย fromย helpingย othersย inย timesย ofย need.ย Itย isย thereforeย recommended thatย anย appropriateย cultureย beย employedย atย differentย timesย toย helpย deliverย satisfactoryย serviceย toย customers of theย scheme.

Lastย but not the least,ย Access Bank inย order toย achieve service qualityย mustย upgradeย theirย Human resourceย systems to boost employeeย morale.

REFERENCES

  • Abu-Doleh,ย J.ย &ย Weir,ย D.ย (2007).ย Dimensionsย ofย performanceย appraisalย systemsย inย Jordanian private and public organizations.ย International Journal of Human Resourceย Management,ย 18(1), 75-84.
  • Arad, S., Hanson, M. A., & Schneider, R. J. (1997). A framework for the study ofย relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation. Theย Journalย of Creativeย Behavior, 31(1), 42-58.
  • A.O.ย Akinsolu,ย Delegationย ofย authorityย aย planningย toolย forย effectiveย schoolย management,ย Ilorinย journal of education
  • Badri, M.A. (2007), โ€œDimensions of Industrial Location factors: Review and Explorationโ€ย Journal of Business and Public Affairs, Vol., 1, No.2 pp. 1-27 Baidoun, S. & Zairi M. A.ย (2003), โ€œProposed Model of TQM Implementation in the Palestinian Contextโ€, TQM &ย Businessย Excellence, Vol., 14, No. 10, pp. 1193โ€“1211
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction inย socialย psychologicalย research:ย Conceptual,ย strategic,ย andย statisticalย considerations.ย Journalย of Personalityย and Social Psychology, 51,ย 1173-1182.
  • Batt, Rosemary, and Lisa M. Moynihan. “Human resource management, service quality,ย andย economicย performanceย in call centers.”ย (2006).
  • Bierly,ย P.ย E.,ย Kessler,ย E.ย H.ย &ย Christensen,ย E.ย W.ย (2000)ย Organizationalย learning,ย knowledge and wisdom, Journal of Organizational Change Management13(6) pp. 595-ย 618.
  • Burke,ย W.ย 1982.ย Organizationย development:ย Principlesย andย practices.ย Boston:ย Little,ย Brownย &ย Co., Boston

Advertisements

WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!