Psychology Project Topics

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and Its Implications for Deviant Behavior Among Teenagers in United Baptist Association, Osun State

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and Its Implications for Deviant Behavior Among Teenagers in United Baptist Association, Osun State

Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy and Its Implications for Deviant Behavior Among Teenagers in United Baptist Association, Osun State

CHAPTER ONE

Objective of the study

The objective of the study is to find out the rational emotive behavior therapy and its implications for deviant behavior among teenagers in United Baptist Association. The specific objectives of the study are;

  1. To find out whether teenagers in United Baptist Association in Osun state will reduce deviant behavior when expose to rational emotive behavior therapy
  2. To find out between male and female teenagers who is more of deviant behavior in United Baptist Association in Osun state
  3. To find out between parents and teachers who to blame for deviant behavior of teenagers in United Baptist Association in Osun state

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

Deviant behaviour is a behaviour portraying a departure from social norms. According to Chamber Dictionary 1st edition, deviant behaviour means to deviate from the norms of particular people, society or community. Such behaviour or activities include crime, drunkenness, indiscipline, drug addiction, bribery and corruption, absenteeism in school and many others.

Michael S. (2004) defined deviant behaviour as that type of behaviour that is contrary to norms and the rules of the study. Nigeria society today is developing; therefore it requires education system that will ensure her development. Hence the Nigeria education system must stimulate the spirit of patriotism and lay the solid foundation for national and international understanding and cooperation in children. Due to this fact, the education of the youth is very important in order to ensure the citizens to the social and economic development of the country as well as raising the standard of living generally.

Deviant behaviour is a form aggressive behavior classified as an anti-social behavior. Deviant  behaviour is a major behaviour problem in our secondary schools today though not only found in schools. Deviant is not a new phenomenon since it may be traced back to the early years of human existence. It has been a world-wide phenomenon that is pervasive in most societies and it exists at home between siblings, in school and in the community at large. Similarly, bullies are everywhere and so are their victims as bullying is experienced by different people in diverse cultures – the only difference is the extent to which it is done (Monks & Smith 2006, Adams & Lawrence, 2010; Cook, Williams, Guerra, Kim & Sadek, 2010;).In our traditional set up in Nigeria, bullying by children, adolescents or young people is not seen as a problem but as a part of growing up or bravery because a boy who   has a bullish behaviour is seen as strong, fearless and courageous.

 

CHAPTER THREE

Research hypotheses

The study formulated the following research hypotheses

H1: there is no significant mean ratings of teenagers in deviant behaviour when exposed to REBT and those not exposed to REBT

H2: there is no significant mean ratings between male and female teenagers in deviant behavior in United Baptist Association in Osun state

H3: there is no significant mean rating between parents and teachers to blame for deviant behavior of teenagers in United Baptist Association in Osun state

CHAPTER FOUR

Deviant: The act of deviating from the norms of a particular people, society or community

Behaviour: This is the way a person, animal, plant or chemical substance etc behaves or function a particular situation

Rational emotive behavior therapy: Rational emotive behavior therapy (REBT) is a type of therapy introduced by Albert Ellis in the 1950s. It’s an approach that helps you identify irrational beliefs and negative thought patterns that may lead to emotional or behavioral issues.

CHAPTER FIVE

REFERENCES

  • Gosling, S. D.; Rentfrow, P. J.; Swann Jr, W. B. (2003). “A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains”. Journal of Research in Personality 37 (6): 504–528. doi:10.1016/S0092- 6566(03)00046-1.
  • Grucza, R.A.; Goldberg, L.R. (2007). “The comparative validity of 11 modern personality inventories: Predictions of behavioral acts, informant reports, and clinical indicators”. Journal of Personality Assessment 89 (2): 167–187. doi:10.1080/00223890701468568.PMID 17764394.
  •  Hirsh, J.B.; DeYoung, C.G.; Peterson, J.B. (2009). “Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior”. Journal of Personality 77: 1085–1101.
  • Hirsh, J.B., DeYoung, C.G., Xu, X., & Peterson, J.B. (2010). Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 655-664.
  •  Higgins, D.M.; Peterson, J.B.; Lee, A.; Pihl, R.O. (2007). “Prefrontal cognitive ability, intelligence, Big Five personality and the prediction of advanced academic and workplace performance”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology93: 298–319.
  • Jang, K.; Livesley, W. J.; Vemon, P. A. (1996). “Heritability of the Big Five Personality Dimensions and Their Facets: A Twin Study”. Journal of Personality 64 (3): 577– 591.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1996.tb00522.x. PMID 8776880.
  • Krug, S.E.; Johns, E.F. (1986). “A large scale cross-validation of second-order personality structure defined by the 16PF”. Psychological Reports 59 (2): 683– 693.doi:10.2466/pr0.1986.59.2.683.
  •  Lucas, Richard E. & Donnellan, M. Brent (2009). “If the person-situation debate is really over, why does it still generate so much negative affect?” Journal of Research in Personality 43 (3): 146–149.